[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221026125354.911575-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 20:53:54 +0800
From: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
To: <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <robin@...tonic.nl>, <linux@...pel-privat.de>,
<kernel@...gutronix.de>, <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
<mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] can: j1939: transport: replace kfree_skb() with dev_kfree_skb_irq()
It is not allowed to call kfree_skb() from hardware interrupt
context or with interrupts being disabled. So replace kfree_skb()
with dev_kfree_skb_irq() under spin_lock_irqsave().
Fixes: 9d71dd0c7009 ("can: add support of SAE J1939 protocol")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
---
net/can/j1939/transport.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/can/j1939/transport.c b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
index d7d86c944d76..b95fb759c49d 100644
--- a/net/can/j1939/transport.c
+++ b/net/can/j1939/transport.c
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static void j1939_session_skb_drop_old(struct j1939_session *session)
/* drop ref taken in j1939_session_skb_queue() */
skb_unref(do_skb);
- kfree_skb(do_skb);
+ dev_kfree_skb_irq(do_skb);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&session->skb_queue.lock, flags);
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists