lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <a4a6186e-e5e7-f9e9-3ba9-b9b8a9a1f37e@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 19:04:29 +0800 From: "luwei (O)" <luwei32@...wei.com> To: <edumazet@...gle.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>, <dsahern@...nel.org>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <xemul@...allels.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> CC: <ovzxemul@...il.com>, <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>, <den@...tuozzo.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] tcp: reset tp->sacked_out when sack is enabled please ignore this patch, I forgot to change the title 在 2022/10/27 7:49 PM, Lu Wei 写道: > If setsockopt with option name of TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS and opt_code > of TCPOPT_SACK_PERM is called to enable sack after data is sent > and before data is acked, it will trigger a warning in function > tcp_verify_left_out() as follows: > > ============================================ > WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 0 at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2132 > tcp_timeout_mark_lost+0x154/0x160 > tcp_enter_loss+0x2b/0x290 > tcp_retransmit_timer+0x50b/0x640 > tcp_write_timer_handler+0x1c8/0x340 > tcp_write_timer+0xe5/0x140 > call_timer_fn+0x3a/0x1b0 > __run_timers.part.0+0x1bf/0x2d0 > run_timer_softirq+0x43/0xb0 > __do_softirq+0xfd/0x373 > __irq_exit_rcu+0xf6/0x140 > > This warning occurs in several steps: > Step1. If sack is not enabled, when server receives dup-ack, > it calls tcp_add_reno_sack() to increase tp->sacked_out. > > Step2. Setsockopt() is called to enable sack > > Step3. The retransmit timer expires, it calls tcp_timeout_mark_lost() > to increase tp->lost_out but not clear tp->sacked_out because > sack is enabled and tcp_is_reno() is false. > > So tp->left_out is increased repeatly in Step1 and Step3 and it is > greater than tp->packets_out and trigger the warning. In function > tcp_timeout_mark_lost(), tp->sacked_out will be cleared if Step2 not > happen and the warning will not be triggered. As suggested by Denis > and Eric, TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS should be prohibited if data was already > sent. > > socket-tcp tests in CRIU has been tested as follows: > $ sudo ./test/zdtm.py run -t zdtm/static/socket-tcp* --keep-going \ > --ignore-taint > > socket-tcp* represent all socket-tcp tests in test/zdtm/static/. > > Fixes: b139ba4e90dc ("tcp: Repair connection-time negotiated parameters") > Signed-off-by: Lu Wei <luwei32@...wei.com> > --- > net/ipv4/tcp.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c > index ef14efa1fb70..ef876e70f7fe 100644 > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c > @@ -3647,7 +3647,7 @@ int do_tcp_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname, > case TCP_REPAIR_OPTIONS: > if (!tp->repair) > err = -EINVAL; > - else if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED) > + else if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED && !tp->packets_out) > err = tcp_repair_options_est(sk, optval, optlen); > else > err = -EPERM; -- Best Regards, Lu Wei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists