[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221027154156.wdi2ka52xwdgm7cj@skbuf>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 18:41:56 +0300
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Camel Guo <camel.guo@...s.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/2] dt-bindings: net: dsa: add bindings for GSW
Series switches
Hi Camel,
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 03:52:40PM +0200, Camel Guo wrote:
> +additionalProperties: true
I don't think the switch schema should have additionalProperties: true.
Only shared schemas should. WHat should be here is "unevaluatedProperties: false".
> + port@5 {
> + reg = <5>;
> + label = "cpu";
Please drop label = "cpu" for the CPU port, it is not needed/not parsed.
> + ethernet = <ð0>;
> + phy-mode = "rgmii-id";
> +
> + fixed-link {
> + speed = <1000>;
> + full-duplex;
> + pause;
> + };
> + };
> + };
Powered by blists - more mailing lists