lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CANP3RGdWDSmvBDsSEWXf+9u_8KQRBzr8NcQCjHB_DPMa83B6PQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 10:52:03 +0900 From: Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: Linux Network Development Mailing List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>, Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: fix inbound ipv4/udp/esp packets to UDPv6 dualstack sockets On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 10:24 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2022 17:42:37 +0900 Maciej Żenczykowski wrote: > > I'll admit that so far I've only tested that the code builds. > > For _a_ definition of builds ;) > > ERROR: modpost: "xfrm4_udp_encap_rcv" [net/ipv6/ipv6.ko] undefined! Oh, it does build - it even boots. egrep 'XFRM|ESP' .config | egrep -v 'is not set' CONFIG_NAMESPACES=y CONFIG_X86_ESPFIX64=y CONFIG_XFRM=y CONFIG_XFRM_ALGO=y CONFIG_XFRM_ESP=y CONFIG_INET6_ESP=y Looking at the Kconfigs/Makefiles, perhaps you have ipv6 as a module? Why would you do that ;-) I don't think my development systems even support booting with ipv6 modularized...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists