netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] netlink: introduce NLA_POLICY_MAX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221027193931.2adce94d@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 27 Oct 2022 19:39:31 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc:     Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] netlink: introduce NLA_POLICY_MAX_BE

On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 01:35:00 +0200 Florian Westphal wrote:
> > In fact we could easily just have three extra types NLA_BE16, NLA_BE32
> > and NLA_BE64 types without even stealing a bit?  
> 
> Sure, I can make a patch if there is consensus that new types are the
> way to go.

The NLA_BE* idea seems appealing, but if the implementation gets
tedious either way works for me.