lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 28 Oct 2022 15:17:46 -0700
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:     Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     john.fastabend@...il.com, jakub@...udflare.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH net] bpf, sockmap: fix the sk->sk_forward_alloc warning of
 sk_stream_kill_queues()

Wang Yufen wrote:
> When running `test_sockmap` selftests, got the following warning:
> 
> WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 197 at net/core/stream.c:205 sk_stream_kill_queues+0xd3/0xf0
> Call Trace:
>   <TASK>
>   inet_csk_destroy_sock+0x55/0x110
>   tcp_rcv_state_process+0xd28/0x1380
>   ? tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77/0x2c0
>   tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x77/0x2c0
>   __release_sock+0x106/0x130
>   __tcp_close+0x1a7/0x4e0
>   tcp_close+0x20/0x70
>   inet_release+0x3c/0x80
>   __sock_release+0x3a/0xb0
>   sock_close+0x14/0x20
>   __fput+0xa3/0x260
>   task_work_run+0x59/0xb0
>   exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x1b3/0x1c0
>   syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x50
>   do_syscall_64+0x48/0x90
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> 
> The root case is: In commit 84472b436e76 ("bpf, sockmap: Fix more
> uncharged while msg has more_data") , I used msg->sg.size replace
> tosend rudely, which break the
>    if (msg->apply_bytes && msg->apply_bytes < send)
> scene.

Ah nice catch. Feel free to add my ACK on a v2 with small typo fixup.

Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>

> 
> Fixes: 84472b436e76 ("bpf, sockmap: Fix more uncharged while msg has more_data")
> Reported-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
> index a1626af..38d4735 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
> @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ static int tcp_bpf_send_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
>  {
>  	bool cork = false, enospc = sk_msg_full(msg);
>  	struct sock *sk_redir;
> -	u32 tosend, delta = 0;
> +	u32 tosend, orgsize, sended, delta = 0;
>  	u32 eval = __SK_NONE;
>  	int ret;
>  
> @@ -333,10 +333,12 @@ static int tcp_bpf_send_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
>  			cork = true;
>  			psock->cork = NULL;
>  		}
> -		sk_msg_return(sk, msg, msg->sg.size);
> +		sk_msg_return(sk, msg, tosend);
>  		release_sock(sk);
>  
> +		orgsize = msg->sg.size;
>  		ret = tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir(sk_redir, msg, tosend, flags);
> +		sended = orgsize - msg->sg.size;

Small english nitpick. Past tense of send is sent so could we make this,

                sent = orgsize - msg->sg.size;

>  
>  		if (eval == __SK_REDIRECT)
>  			sock_put(sk_redir);
> @@ -374,8 +376,8 @@ static int tcp_bpf_send_verdict(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
>  		if (msg &&
>  		    msg->sg.data[msg->sg.start].page_link &&
>  		    msg->sg.data[msg->sg.start].length) {
> -			if (eval == __SK_REDIRECT)
> -				sk_mem_charge(sk, msg->sg.size);
> +			if (eval == __SK_REDIRECT && tosend > sended)

Other nit, you could probably omit the 'tosend > sended' check here. Because
otherwise tosend == sended and the mem_charge of zer is a nop. But OTOH
its probably ok to keep the check to avoid some extra work.

> +				sk_mem_charge(sk, tosend - sended);
>  			goto more_data;
>  		}
>  	}
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists