[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b14fbd79-31e6-3409-e4f3-dae675219e1b@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 16:44:00 +0800
From: shaozhengchao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
CC: <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<socketcan@...tkopp.net>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<linux@...pel-privat.de>, <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>,
<yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] can: af_can: fix NULL pointer dereference in
can_rx_register()
On 2022/10/28 15:33, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 28.10.2022 11:33:42, Zhengchao Shao wrote:
>> It causes NULL pointer dereference when testing as following:
>> (a) use syscall(__NR_socket, 0x10ul, 3ul, 0) to create netlink socket.
>> (b) use syscall(__NR_sendmsg, ...) to create bond link device and vxcan
>> link device, and bind vxcan device to bond device (can also use
>> ifenslave command to bind vxcan device to bond device).
>> (c) use syscall(__NR_socket, 0x1dul, 3ul, 1) to create CAN socket.
>> (d) use syscall(__NR_bind, ...) to bind the bond device to CAN socket.
>>
>> The bond device invokes the can-raw protocol registration interface to
>> receive CAN packets. However, ml_priv is not allocated to the dev,
>> dev_rcv_lists is assigned to NULL in can_rx_register(). In this case,
>> it will occur the NULL pointer dereference issue.
>>
>> The following is the stack information:
>> BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000008
>> PGD 122a4067 P4D 122a4067 PUD 1223c067 PMD 0
>> Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>> RIP: 0010:can_rx_register+0x12d/0x1e0
>> Call Trace:
>> <TASK>
>> raw_enable_filters+0x8d/0x120
>> raw_enable_allfilters+0x3b/0x130
>> raw_bind+0x118/0x4f0
>> __sys_bind+0x163/0x1a0
>> __x64_sys_bind+0x1e/0x30
>> do_syscall_64+0x35/0x80
>> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>> </TASK>
>>
>> Fixes: 4e096a18867a ("net: introduce CAN specific pointer in the struct net_device")
>> Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> net/can/af_can.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/can/af_can.c b/net/can/af_can.c
>> index 9503ab10f9b8..ef2697f3ebcb 100644
>> --- a/net/can/af_can.c
>> +++ b/net/can/af_can.c
>> @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ int can_rx_register(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev, canid_t can_id,
>>
>> /* insert new receiver (dev,canid,mask) -> (func,data) */
>>
>> - if (dev && dev->type != ARPHRD_CAN)
>> + if (dev && (dev->type != ARPHRD_CAN || dev->ml_priv_type != ML_PRIV_CAN))
>
> You can use the helper function: can_get_ml_priv() instead of open
> coding the check.
>
> Reviewed-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
>
> regards,
> Marc
>
Hi Marc:
Thank you for your review. And I will fix it in V2.
Zhengchao Shao
Powered by blists - more mailing lists