netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: tun: fix bugs for oversize packet when napi frags enabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Oct 2022 21:07:52 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        peterpenkov96@...il.com, maheshb@...gle.com, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: tun: fix bugs for oversize packet when napi
 frags enabled

On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 8:32 PM Ziyang Xuan
<william.xuanziyang@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Recently, we got two syzkaller problems because of oversize packet
> when napi frags enabled.
>
> One of the problems is because the first seg size of the iov_iter
> from user space is very big, it is 2147479538 which is bigger than
> the threshold value for bail out early in __alloc_pages(). And
> skb->pfmemalloc is true, __kmalloc_reserve() would use pfmemalloc
> reserves without __GFP_NOWARN flag. Thus we got a warning as following:
>
> ========================================================
>

> Restrict the packet size less than ETH_MAX_MTU to fix the problems.
> Add len check in tun_napi_alloc_frags() simply. Athough that makes
> some kinds of packets payload size slightly smaller than the length
> allowed by the protocol, for example, ETH_HLEN + sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)
> smaller when the tun device type is IFF_TAP and the packet is IPv6. But
> I think that the effect is small and can be ignored.

I am not sure about ETH_MAX_MTU being completely safe.

napi_get_frags() / napi_alloc_skb() is reserving NET_SKB_PAD +
NET_IP_ALIGN bytes.

transport_header being an offset from skb->head,
we probably want to use (ETH_MAX_MTU - NET_SKB_PAD - NET_IP_ALIGN)

My objection to your initial patch was that you were using PAGE_SIZE,
while Ethernet MTU can easily be ~9000

But 0xFFFF is a bit too much/risky.

Thanks.

>
> Fixes: 90e33d459407 ("tun: enable napi_gro_frags() for TUN/TAP driver")
> Signed-off-by: Ziyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@...wei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/tun.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 27c6d235cbda..98d3160fcae2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -1459,7 +1459,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *tun_napi_alloc_frags(struct tun_file *tfile,
>         int err;
>         int i;
>
> -       if (it->nr_segs > MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1)
> +       if (it->nr_segs > MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1 || len > ETH_MAX_MTU)
>                 return ERR_PTR(-EMSGSIZE);
>
>         local_bh_disable();
> --
> 2.25.1
>