[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202210290008.F909BCDEB3@keescook>
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 00:08:53 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] zd1201: Avoid clashing function prototypes
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 03:19:19PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> When built with Control Flow Integrity, function prototypes between
> caller and function declaration must match. These mismatches are visible
> at compile time with the new -Wcast-function-type-strict in Clang[1].
>
> Fix a total of 30 warnings like these:
>
> ../drivers/net/wireless/zydas/zd1201.c:1560:2: warning: cast from 'int (*)(struct net_device *, struct iw_request_info *, struct iw_freq *, char *)' to 'iw_handler' (aka 'int (*)(struct net_device *, struct iw_request_info *, union iwreq_data *, char *)') converts to incompatible function type [-Wcast-function-type-strict]
> (iw_handler) zd1201_set_freq, /* SIOCSIWFREQ */
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> The zd1201 Wireless Extension handler callbacks (iw_handler) use a
> union for the data argument. Actually use the union and perform explicit
> member selection in the function body instead of having a function
> prototype mismatch.There are no resulting binary differences
> before/after changes.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/233
> Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134831 [1]
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
This looks right to me. I've got half a cocci script that spits out
something close says interdiff. :)
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists