[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y14yD7i53usq1ge8@unreal>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2022 10:13:03 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
Mark Starovoytov <mstarovoitov@...vell.com>,
Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/5] Revert "net: macsec: report real_dev features
when HW offloading is enabled"
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 11:56:23PM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> This reverts commit c850240b6c4132574a00f2da439277ab94265b66.
>
> That commit tried to improve the performance of macsec offload by
> taking advantage of some of the NIC's features, but in doing so, broke
> macsec offload when the lower device supports both macsec and ipsec
> offload, as the ipsec offload feature flags (mainly NETIF_F_HW_ESP)
> were copied from the real device. Since the macsec device doesn't
> provide xdo_* ops, the XFRM core rejects the registration of the new
> macsec device in xfrm_api_check.
>
> Example perf trace when running
> ip link add link eni1np1 type macsec port 4 offload mac
>
> ip 737 [003] 795.477676: probe:xfrm_dev_event__REGISTER name="macsec0" features=0x1c000080014869
> xfrm_dev_event+0x3a
> notifier_call_chain+0x47
> register_netdevice+0x846
> macsec_newlink+0x25a
>
> ip 737 [003] 795.477687: probe:xfrm_dev_event__return ret=0x8002 (NOTIFY_BAD)
> notifier_call_chain+0x47
> register_netdevice+0x846
> macsec_newlink+0x25a
>
> dev->features includes NETIF_F_HW_ESP (0x04000000000000), so
> xfrm_api_check returns NOTIFY_BAD because we don't have
> dev->xfrmdev_ops on the macsec device.
>
> We could probably propagate GSO and a few other features from the
> lower device, similar to macvlan. This will be done in a future patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
> ---
> drivers/net/macsec.c | 27 ++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
It is still mystery for me why mlx5 works.
Thanks,
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists