[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221031142907.164469-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 15:29:07 +0100
From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, brouer@...hat.com,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
song@...nel.org, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@...el.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>,
Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@...hat.com>, xdp-hints@...-project.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Test rx_timestamp metadata in xskxceiver
From: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 15:20:32 +0100
> From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 11:46:14 -0700
>
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 3:37 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> > <jbrouer@...hat.com> wrote:
[...]
> > I don't think __xdp_build_skb_from_frame is automagically solved by
> > either proposal?
>
> It's solved in my approach[0], so that __xdp_build_skb_from_frame()
Yeah sure forget to paste the link, why doncha?
[0] https://github.com/alobakin/linux/commit/a43a9d6895fa11f182becf3a7c202eeceb45a16a
> are automatically get skb fields populated with the metadata if
> available. But I always use a fixed generic structure, which can't
> compete with your series in terms of flexibility (but solves stuff
> like inter-vendor redirects and so on).
[...]
> Thanks,
> Olek
Thanks,
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists