[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221031090822.q4zux45vrqr2wqi5@skbuf>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2022 09:08:23 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>,
"netdev@...io-technology.com" <netdev@...io-technology.com>,
"mlxsw@...dia.com" <mlxsw@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rocker: Explicitly mark learned FDB entries as
offloaded
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 10:32:04AM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 09:59:22AM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_ofdpa.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_ofdpa.c
> > index 58cf7cc54f40..f5880d0053da 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_ofdpa.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_ofdpa.c
> > @@ -1828,12 +1828,14 @@ static void ofdpa_port_fdb_learn_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > info.vid = lw->vid;
> >
> > rtnl_lock();
> > - if (learned && removing)
> > + if (learned && removing) {
> > call_switchdev_notifiers(SWITCHDEV_FDB_DEL_TO_BRIDGE,
> > lw->ofdpa_port->dev, &info.info, NULL);
> > - else if (learned && !removing)
> > + } else if (learned && !removing) {
> > + info.offloaded = true;
> > call_switchdev_notifiers(SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_BRIDGE,
> > lw->ofdpa_port->dev, &info.info, NULL);
> > + }
> > rtnl_unlock();
> >
> > kfree(work);
>
> Looking at it again, this is better:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_ofdpa.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_ofdpa.c
> index 58cf7cc54f40..4d17ae18ea61 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_ofdpa.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/rocker/rocker_ofdpa.c
> @@ -1826,6 +1826,7 @@ static void ofdpa_port_fdb_learn_work(struct work_struct *work)
>
> info.addr = lw->addr;
> info.vid = lw->vid;
> + info.offloaded = learned && !removing;
>
> rtnl_lock();
> if (learned && removing)
>
> Will send another version tomorrow assuming no other comments.
It may also be an opportunity to not take rtnl_lock() if (!learned), and
this will in turn simplify the condition to just "info.offloaded = !removing"?
Actually this elimination of useless work should be done at the level of
ofdpa_port_fdb_learn(), if "flags" does not contain OFDPA_OP_FLAG_LEARNED.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists