lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221101150031.a6rtrgzwfd7kzknn@t14s.localdomain>
Date:   Tue, 1 Nov 2022 12:00:31 -0300
From:   Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To:     Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc:     network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, dev@...nvswitch.org,
        ovs-dev@...nvswitch.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>,
        Davide Caratti <dcaratti@...hat.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@....org>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, kuba@...nel.org,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCHv3 net-next 4/4] net: sched: add helper support
 in act_ct

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 11:36:10AM -0400, Xin Long wrote:
...
> --- a/net/sched/act_ct.c
> +++ b/net/sched/act_ct.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>  #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_acct.h>
>  #include <net/netfilter/ipv6/nf_defrag_ipv6.h>
>  #include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_act_ct.h>
> +#include <net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_seqadj.h>
>  #include <uapi/linux/netfilter/nf_nat.h>
>  
>  static struct workqueue_struct *act_ct_wq;
> @@ -655,7 +656,7 @@ struct tc_ct_action_net {
>  
>  /* Determine whether skb->_nfct is equal to the result of conntrack lookup. */
>  static bool tcf_ct_skb_nfct_cached(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
> -				   u16 zone_id, bool force)
> +				   struct tcf_ct_params *p, bool force)

Nit, it could have fetched 'force' from p->ct_action too then, as it
is only used in this function.

There's a typo in Ilya's name in the cover letter.

Other than this, LGTM.
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ