[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221102081006.70a81e89@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 08:10:06 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, tariqt@...dia.com, moshe@...dia.com,
saeedm@...dia.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v3 13/13] net: expose devlink port over
rtnetlink
On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 12:22:09 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Why produce the empty nest if port is not set?
>
> Empty nest indicates that kernel supports this but there is no devlink
> port associated. I see no other way to indicate this :/
Maybe it's time to plumb policies thru to classic netlink, instead of
creating weird attribute constructs?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists