netdev - Re: [PATCH v4,bpf-next] bpf: Don't redirect packets with invalid pkt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 3 Nov 2022 15:42:23 -0700
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To:     Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
Cc:     Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, song@...nel.org,
        yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        bigeasy@...utronix.de, imagedong@...cent.com, petrm@...dia.com,
        arnd@...db.de, dsahern@...nel.org, talalahmad@...gle.com,
        keescook@...omium.org, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
        weiyongjun1@...wei.com, yuehaibing@...wei.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, hawk@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4,bpf-next] bpf: Don't redirect packets with invalid
 pkt_len

On 11/3/22 2:36 PM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2022 at 2:07 PM Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/15/22 4:55 AM, Zhengchao Shao wrote:
>>> Syzbot found an issue [1]: fq_codel_drop() try to drop a flow whitout any
>>> skbs, that is, the flow->head is null.
>>> The root cause, as the [2] says, is because that bpf_prog_test_run_skb()
>>> run a bpf prog which redirects empty skbs.
>>> So we should determine whether the length of the packet modified by bpf
>>> prog or others like bpf_prog_test is valid before forwarding it directly.
>>>
>>> LINK: [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=0b84da80c2917757915afa89f7738a9d16ec96c5
>>> LINK: [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg777503.html
>>>
>>> Reported-by: syzbot+7a12909485b94426aceb@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>>> v3: modify debug print
>>> v2: need move checking to convert___skb_to_skb and add debug info
>>> v1: should not check len in fast path
>>>
>>>    include/linux/skbuff.h | 8 ++++++++
>>>    net/bpf/test_run.c     | 3 +++
>>>    net/core/dev.c         | 1 +
>>>    3 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
>>> index f6a27ab19202..82e8368ba6e6 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
>>> @@ -2459,6 +2459,14 @@ static inline void skb_set_tail_pointer(struct sk_buff *skb, const int offset)
>>>
>>>    #endif /* NET_SKBUFF_DATA_USES_OFFSET */
>>>
>>> +static inline void skb_assert_len(struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> +{
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_NET
>>> +     if (WARN_ONCE(!skb->len, "%s\n", __func__))
>>> +             DO_ONCE_LITE(skb_dump, KERN_ERR, skb, false);
>>> +#endif /* CONFIG_DEBUG_NET */
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    /*
>>>     *  Add data to an sk_buff
>>>     */
>>> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
>>> index 2ca96acbc50a..dc9dc0bedca0 100644
>>> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
>>> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
>>> @@ -955,6 +955,9 @@ static int convert___skb_to_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, struct __sk_buff *__skb)
>>>    {
>>>        struct qdisc_skb_cb *cb = (struct qdisc_skb_cb *)skb->cb;
>>>
>>> +     if (!skb->len)
>>> +             return -EINVAL;
>>
>>   From another recent report [0], I don't think this change is fixing the report
>> from syzbot.  It probably makes sense to revert this patch.
>>
>> afaict, This '!skb->len' test is done after
>>          if (is_l2)
>>                  __skb_push(skb, hh_len);
>>
>> Hence, skb->len is not zero in convert___skb_to_skb().  The proper place to test
>> skb->len is before __skb_push() to ensure there is some network header after the
>> mac or may as well ensure "data_size_in > ETH_HLEN" at the beginning.
> 
> When is_l2==true, __skb_push will result in non-zero skb->len, so we
> should be good, right?
> The only issue is when we do bpf_redirect into a tunneling device and
> do __skb_pull, but that's now fixed by [0].
> 
> When is_l2==false, the existing check in convert___skb_to_skb will
> make sure there is something in the l3 headers.
> 
> So it seems like this patch is still needed. Or am I missing something?

Replied in [0].  I think a small change in [0] will make this patch obsolete.

My thinking is the !skb->len test in this patch does not address all cases, at 
least not the most common one (the sch_cls prog where is_l2 == true) and then it 
needs another change in __bpf_redirect_no_mac [0].  Then, instead of breaking 
the existing test cases,  may as well solely depend on the change in 
__bpf_redirect_no_mac which seems to be the only redirect function that does not 
have the len check now.

> 
>> The fix in [0] is applied.  If it turns out there are other cases caused by the
>> skb generated by test_run that needs extra fixes in bpf_redirect_*,  it needs to
>> revisit an earlier !skb->len check mentioned above and the existing test cases
>> outside of test_progs would have to adjust accordingly.
>>
>> [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221027225537.353077-1-sdf@google.com/
>>
>>> +
>>>        if (!__skb)
>>>                return 0;
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
>>> index d588fd0a54ce..716df64fcfa5 100644
>>> --- a/net/core/dev.c
>>> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
>>> @@ -4168,6 +4168,7 @@ int __dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *sb_dev)
>>>        bool again = false;
>>>
>>>        skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
>>> +     skb_assert_len(skb);
>>>
>>>        if (unlikely(skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_SCHED_TSTAMP))
>>>                __skb_tstamp_tx(skb, NULL, NULL, skb->sk, SCM_TSTAMP_SCHED);
>>