[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221103230316.k5gocnfkdslkdimq@skbuf>
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2022 23:03:17 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"jiri@...dia.com" <jiri@...dia.com>,
"petrm@...dia.com" <petrm@...dia.com>,
"ivecera@...hat.com" <ivecera@...hat.com>,
"roopa@...dia.com" <roopa@...dia.com>,
"razor@...ckwall.org" <razor@...ckwall.org>,
"netdev@...io-technology.com" <netdev@...io-technology.com>,
"mlxsw@...dia.com" <mlxsw@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 10/16] mlxsw: spectrum_switchdev: Add support
for locked FDB notifications
On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 12:54:39AM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Sorry, forgot to reply... I added a patch (see below) to the offload
> set. If the bridge patches are accepted and we have disagreements on the
> offload part I can always split out this patch and send it separately so
> that mv88e6xxx rejects MAB in 6.2.
>
> commit ebdd7363f8c1802af63c35f74d6922b727617a7d
> Author: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
> Date: Mon Oct 31 19:36:36 2022 +0200
>
> bridge: switchdev: Reflect MAB bridge port flag to device drivers
>
> Reflect the 'BR_PORT_MAB' flag to device drivers so that:
>
> * Drivers that support MAB could act upon the flag being toggled.
> * Drivers that do not support MAB will prevent MAB from being enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
>
> Notes:
> v1:
> * New patch.
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> index 8a0abe35137d..7eb6fd5bb917 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_switchdev.c
> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ bool nbp_switchdev_allowed_egress(const struct net_bridge_port *p,
> }
>
> /* Flags that can be offloaded to hardware */
> -#define BR_PORT_FLAGS_HW_OFFLOAD (BR_LEARNING | BR_FLOOD | \
> +#define BR_PORT_FLAGS_HW_OFFLOAD (BR_LEARNING | BR_FLOOD | BR_PORT_MAB | \
> BR_MCAST_FLOOD | BR_BCAST_FLOOD | BR_PORT_LOCKED | \
> BR_HAIRPIN_MODE | BR_ISOLATED | BR_MULTICAST_TO_UNICAST)
Yeah, ok, normally the feature would be gated until it really works on
existing offloading drivers, but I suppose a compromise from 100%
correctness could be made if you say you're going to send the offload
bits right away.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists