netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2] bpf: Fix memory leaks in __check_func

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 3 Nov 2022 09:15:16 +0800
From:   wangyufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
CC:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...nel.org>,
        <daniel@...earbox.net>, <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        <andrii@...nel.org>, <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, <yhs@...com>,
        <joe@...d.net.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] bpf: Fix memory leaks in __check_func_call


在 2022/11/3 3:06, Andrii Nakryiko 写道:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2022 at 12:05 PM Andrii Nakryiko
> <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 10:01 PM Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com> wrote:
>>> kmemleak reports this issue:
>>>
>>> unreferenced object 0xffff88817139d000 (size 2048):
>>>    comm "test_progs", pid 33246, jiffies 4307381979 (age 45851.820s)
>>>    hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>>>      01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
>>>      00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
>>>    backtrace:
>>>      [<0000000045f075f0>] kmalloc_trace+0x27/0xa0
>>>      [<0000000098b7c90a>] __check_func_call+0x316/0x1230
>>>      [<00000000b4c3c403>] check_helper_call+0x172e/0x4700
>>>      [<00000000aa3875b7>] do_check+0x21d8/0x45e0
>>>      [<000000001147357b>] do_check_common+0x767/0xaf0
>>>      [<00000000b5a595b4>] bpf_check+0x43e3/0x5bc0
>>>      [<0000000011e391b1>] bpf_prog_load+0xf26/0x1940
>>>      [<0000000007f765c0>] __sys_bpf+0xd2c/0x3650
>>>      [<00000000839815d6>] __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xc0
>>>      [<00000000946ee250>] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
>>>      [<0000000000506b7f>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>>>
>>> The root case here is: In function prepare_func_exit(), the callee is
>>> not released in the abnormal scenario after "state->curframe--;". To
>>> fix, move "state->curframe--;" to the very bottom of the function,
>>> right when we free callee and reset frame[] pointer to NULL, as Andrii
>>> suggested.
>>>
>>> In addition, function __check_func_call() has a similar problem. In
>>> the abnormal scenario before "state->curframe++;", the callee is alse
>>> not released.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 69c087ba6225 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
>>> Fixes: fd978bf7fd31 ("bpf: Add reference tracking to verifier")
>>> Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
>>> ---
>> This change seems to be breaking BPF selftests quite badly, please
>> check what's going on ([0]):
>>
>>    [0] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/3379444311/jobs/5611599540
>>
> And also please target it against bpf tree: [PATCH bpf], not net tree.
OK， thanks！
>
>>>   kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 11 ++++++++---
>>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>>> index 014ee09..d28d460 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
>>> @@ -6736,11 +6736,11 @@ static int __check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
>>>          /* Transfer references to the callee */
>>>          err = copy_reference_state(callee, caller);
>>>          if (err)
>>> -               return err;
>>> +               goto err_out;
>>>
>>>          err = set_callee_state_cb(env, caller, callee, *insn_idx);
>>>          if (err)
>>> -               return err;
>>> +               goto err_out;
>>>
>>>          clear_caller_saved_regs(env, caller->regs);
>>>
>>> @@ -6757,6 +6757,11 @@ static int __check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
>>>                  print_verifier_state(env, callee, true);
>>>          }
>>>          return 0;
>>> +
>>> +err_out:
>>> +       kfree(callee);
>>> +       state->frame[state->curframe + 1] = NULL;
>>> +       return err;
>>>   }
>>>
>>>   int map_set_for_each_callback_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
>>> @@ -6969,7 +6974,6 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
>>>                  return -EINVAL;
>>>          }
>>>
>>> -       state->curframe--;
>>>          caller = state->frame[state->curframe];
>>>          if (callee->in_callback_fn) {
>>>                  /* enforce R0 return value range [0, 1]. */
>>> @@ -7000,6 +7004,7 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
>>>                          return err;
>>>          }
>>>
>>> +       state->curframe--;
>>>          *insn_idx = callee->callsite + 1;
>>>          if (env->log.level & BPF_LOG_LEVEL) {
>>>                  verbose(env, "returning from callee:\n");
>>> --
>>> 1.8.3.1
>>>