[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61945062-4261-ba3d-0d39-8c1cc46ad33b@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 13:13:34 -0400
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: nxp,sja1105: document spi-cpol/cpha
On 04/11/2022 12:52, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 04, 2022 at 09:09:02AM -0400, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> I think that spi-cpha/spi-cpol belongs to spi-peripheral-props.yaml just
>>> as much as the others do.
>>>
>>> The distinction "device specific, not controller specific" is arbitrary
>>> to me. These are settings that the controller has to make in order to
>>> talk to that specific peripheral. Same as many others in that file.
>>
>> Not every fruit is an orange, but every orange is a fruit. You do not
>> put "color: orange" to schema for fruits. You put it to the schema for
>> oranges.
>>
>> IOW, CPHA/CPOL are not valid for most devices, so they cannot be in
>> spi-peripheral-props.yaml.
>
> Ok, then this patch is not correct either. The "nxp,sja1105*" devices
> need to have only "spi-cpha", and the "nxp,sja1110*" devices need to
> have only "spi-cpol".
Sure, I'll add allOf:if:then based on your input.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists