[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <da8cb23e4b0909a3bdde8e267b4df7df4c1575f7.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2022 09:54:10 +0100
From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Adrien Thierry <athierry@...hat.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/net: give more time to udpgro bg processes to
complete startup
On Thu, 2022-11-03 at 20:46 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 14:48:08 -0400 Adrien Thierry wrote:
> > In some conditions, background processes in udpgro don't have enough
> > time to set up the sockets. When foreground processes start, this
> > results in the test failing with "./udpgso_bench_tx: sendmsg: Connection
> > refused". For instance, this happens from time to time on a Qualcomm
> > SA8540P SoC running CentOS Stream 9.
> >
> > To fix this, increase the time given to background processes to
> > complete the startup before foreground processes start.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrien Thierry <athierry@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > This is a continuation of the hack that's present in those tests. Other
> > ideas are welcome to fix this in a more permanent way.
>
> Perhaps we can add an option to the Rx side to daemonize itself after
> setting up the socket, that way the bash script will be locked until
> Rx is ready?
Then it will be less straigh-forward for the running shell waiting for
all the running processes.
Another option would be replacing the sleep with a loop waiting for
the rx UDP socket to appear in the procfs or diag interface, alike what
mptcp self-tests (random example;) are doing:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.1-rc3/source/tools/testing/selftests/net/mptcp/mptcp_join.sh#L424
Cheers,
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists