[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221104192510.32193898@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 19:25:10 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] net: devlink: expose the info about version
representing a component
On Fri, 4 Nov 2022 16:24:25 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> If certain version exposed by a driver is marked to be representing a
> component, expose this info to the user.
>
> Example:
> $ devlink dev info
> netdevsim/netdevsim10:
> driver netdevsim
> versions:
> running:
> fw.mgmt 10.20.30
> flash_components:
> fw.mgmt
Didn't I complain that this makes no practical sense because
user needs to know what file to flash, to which component?
Or was that a different flag that I was complaining about?
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
> index 2f24b53a87a5..7f2874189188 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/devlink.h
> @@ -607,6 +607,8 @@ enum devlink_attr {
>
> DEVLINK_ATTR_SELFTESTS, /* nested */
>
> + DEVLINK_ATTR_INFO_VERSION_IS_COMPONENT, /* u8 0 or 1 */
In the interest of fairness I should complain about the use of u8/u16
devlink is genetlink so user will know kernel supports the attribute
(by looking at family->maxattr). So this can be a flag.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists