netdev - [PATCH bpf v2 0/5] bpf: Support kernel function call in 32-bit ARM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221107092032.178235-1-yangjihong1@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Nov 2022 17:20:27 +0800
From:   Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>
To:     <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <andrii@...nel.org>,
        <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, <song@...nel.org>, <yhs@...com>,
        <john.fastabend@...il.com>, <kpsingh@...nel.org>, <sdf@...gle.com>,
        <haoluo@...gle.com>, <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        <illusionist.neo@...il.com>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>, <mykolal@...com>, <shuah@...nel.org>,
        <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>, <memxor@...il.com>,
        <asavkov@...hat.com>, <delyank@...com>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <yangjihong1@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 0/5] bpf: Support kernel function call in 32-bit ARM

1. Patch1 is dependent patch to fix zext extension error in 32-bit ARM.
2. Patch2 and patch3 solve the problem that the bpf check fails because
   load's mem size is modified in CO_RE from the kernel and user modes,
   Currently, there are different opinions and a final solution needs to
   be selected.
3. Patch4 supports bpf fkunc in 32-bit ARM for EABI.
4. Patch5 is used to add test cases to cover some parameter scenarios
   states by AAPCS.

The following is the test_progs result in the 32-bit ARM environment:

  # uname -m
  armv7l
  # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable
  # ./test_progs -t kfunc_call
  #1/1     kfunc_call/kfunc_syscall_test_fail:OK
  #1/2     kfunc_call/kfunc_syscall_test_null_fail:OK
  #1/3     kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem_fail_rdonly:OK
  #1/4     kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem_fail_use_after_free:OK
  #1/5     kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem_fail_oob:OK
  #1/6     kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem_fail_not_const:OK
  #1/7     kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_mem_acquire_fail:OK
  #1/8     kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test1:OK
  #1/9     kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test2:OK
  #1/10    kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test4:OK
  #1/11    kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_ref_btf_id:OK
  #1/12    kfunc_call/kfunc_call_test_get_mem:OK
  #1/13    kfunc_call/kfunc_syscall_test:OK
  #1/14    kfunc_call/kfunc_syscall_test_null:OK
  #1/17    kfunc_call/destructive:OK


Yang Jihong (5):
  bpf: Adapt 32-bit return value kfunc for 32-bit ARM when zext
    extension
  bpf: Adjust sk size check for sk in bpf_skb_is_valid_access for CO_RE
    in 32-bit arch
  libbpf: Skip adjust mem size for load pointer in 32-bit arch in CO_RE
  bpf: Add kernel function call support in 32-bit ARM for EABI
  bpf:selftests: Add kfunc_call test for mixing 32-bit and 64-bit
    parameters

 arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c                     | 142 ++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                         |   3 +
 net/bpf/test_run.c                            |  18 +++
 net/core/filter.c                             |   8 +-
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c                        |  34 ++++-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c     |   3 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c     |  52 +++++++
 7 files changed, 254 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.30.GIT