lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9fb8b83ce2029c51c81c942f24ece789ae8fe1c1.1667902754.git.petrm@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 11:47:21 +0100
From:   Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
        Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
        <bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
        "Hans J . Schultz" <netdev@...io-technology.com>,
        <mlxsw@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 15/15] selftests: mlxsw: Add a test for invalid locked bridge port configurations

From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>

Test that locked bridge port configurations that are not supported by
mlxsw are rejected.

Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
---
 .../selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/rtnetlink.sh  | 31 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/rtnetlink.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/rtnetlink.sh
index 04f03ae9d8fb..5e89657857c7 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/rtnetlink.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/mlxsw/rtnetlink.sh
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ ALL_TESTS="
 	nexthop_obj_bucket_offload_test
 	nexthop_obj_blackhole_offload_test
 	nexthop_obj_route_offload_test
+	bridge_locked_port_test
 	devlink_reload_test
 "
 NUM_NETIFS=2
@@ -917,6 +918,36 @@ nexthop_obj_route_offload_test()
 	simple_if_fini $swp1 192.0.2.1/24 2001:db8:1::1/64
 }
 
+bridge_locked_port_test()
+{
+	RET=0
+
+	ip link add name br1 up type bridge vlan_filtering 0
+
+	ip link add link $swp1 name $swp1.10 type vlan id 10
+	ip link set dev $swp1.10 master br1
+
+	bridge link set dev $swp1.10 locked on
+	check_fail $? "managed to set locked flag on a VLAN upper"
+
+	ip link set dev $swp1.10 nomaster
+	ip link set dev $swp1 master br1
+
+	bridge link set dev $swp1 locked on
+	check_fail $? "managed to set locked flag on a bridge port that has a VLAN upper"
+
+	ip link del dev $swp1.10
+	bridge link set dev $swp1 locked on
+
+	ip link add link $swp1 name $swp1.10 type vlan id 10
+	check_fail $? "managed to configure a VLAN upper on a locked port"
+
+	log_test "bridge locked port"
+
+	ip link del dev $swp1.10 &> /dev/null
+	ip link del dev br1
+}
+
 devlink_reload_test()
 {
 	# Test that after executing all the above configuration tests, a
-- 
2.35.3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ