[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221108153006.githtup7oisty4qb@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 17:30:06 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
"Hans J . Schultz" <netdev@...io-technology.com>, mlxsw@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 14/15] selftests: mlxsw: Add a test for locked
port trap
On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 11:47:20AM +0100, Petr Machata wrote:
> From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
>
> Test that packets received via a locked bridge port whose {SMAC, VID}
> does not appear in the bridge's FDB or appears with a different port,
> trigger the "locked_port" packet trap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
> ---
Pretty impressively designed. I liked the extensive checks (for example
that traps stop counting after port security is disabled).
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists