lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 08 Nov 2022 22:19:47 +0000
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 18/26] rxrpc: Split the rxrpc_recvmsg tracepoint

Split the rxrpc_recvmsg tracepoint so that the tracepoints that are about
data packet processing (and which have extra pieces of information) are
separate from the tracepoint that shows the general flow of recvmsg().

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>
cc: linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org
---

 include/trace/events/rxrpc.h |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c          |   37 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
index d32e9858c682..84464b29e54a 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
@@ -885,6 +885,30 @@ TRACE_EVENT(rxrpc_receive,
 	    );
 
 TRACE_EVENT(rxrpc_recvmsg,
+	    TP_PROTO(struct rxrpc_call *call, enum rxrpc_recvmsg_trace why,
+		     int ret),
+
+	    TP_ARGS(call, why, ret),
+
+	    TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		    __field(unsigned int,		call		)
+		    __field(enum rxrpc_recvmsg_trace,	why		)
+		    __field(int,			ret		)
+			     ),
+
+	    TP_fast_assign(
+		    __entry->call = call ? call->debug_id : 0;
+		    __entry->why = why;
+		    __entry->ret = ret;
+			   ),
+
+	    TP_printk("c=%08x %s ret=%d",
+		      __entry->call,
+		      __print_symbolic(__entry->why, rxrpc_recvmsg_traces),
+		      __entry->ret)
+	    );
+
+TRACE_EVENT(rxrpc_recvdata,
 	    TP_PROTO(struct rxrpc_call *call, enum rxrpc_recvmsg_trace why,
 		     rxrpc_seq_t seq, unsigned int offset, unsigned int len,
 		     int ret),
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c b/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c
index 46e784edc0f4..77cde6311559 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/recvmsg.c
@@ -173,8 +173,8 @@ static int rxrpc_recvmsg_term(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct msghdr *msg)
 		break;
 	}
 
-	trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_terminal, call->rx_hard_ack,
-			    call->rx_pkt_offset, call->rx_pkt_len, ret);
+	trace_rxrpc_recvdata(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_terminal, call->rx_hard_ack,
+			     call->rx_pkt_offset, call->rx_pkt_len, ret);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -380,8 +380,8 @@ static int rxrpc_recvmsg_data(struct socket *sock, struct rxrpc_call *call,
 		ix = seq & RXRPC_RXTX_BUFF_MASK;
 		skb = call->rxtx_buffer[ix];
 		if (!skb) {
-			trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_hole, seq,
-					    rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, 0);
+			trace_rxrpc_recvdata(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_hole, seq,
+					     rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, 0);
 			rxrpc_transmit_ack_packets(call->peer->local);
 			break;
 		}
@@ -404,15 +404,15 @@ static int rxrpc_recvmsg_data(struct socket *sock, struct rxrpc_call *call,
 						 &call->rxtx_annotations[ix],
 						 &rx_pkt_offset, &rx_pkt_len,
 						 &rx_pkt_last);
-			trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_next, seq,
-					    rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, ret2);
+			trace_rxrpc_recvdata(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_next, seq,
+					     rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, ret2);
 			if (ret2 < 0) {
 				ret = ret2;
 				goto out;
 			}
 		} else {
-			trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_cont, seq,
-					    rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, 0);
+			trace_rxrpc_recvdata(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_cont, seq,
+					     rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, 0);
 		}
 
 		/* We have to handle short, empty and used-up DATA packets. */
@@ -435,8 +435,8 @@ static int rxrpc_recvmsg_data(struct socket *sock, struct rxrpc_call *call,
 		}
 
 		if (rx_pkt_len > 0) {
-			trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_full, seq,
-					    rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, 0);
+			trace_rxrpc_recvdata(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_full, seq,
+					     rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, 0);
 			ASSERTCMP(*_offset, ==, len);
 			ret = 0;
 			break;
@@ -464,8 +464,8 @@ static int rxrpc_recvmsg_data(struct socket *sock, struct rxrpc_call *call,
 		call->rx_pkt_last = rx_pkt_last;
 	}
 done:
-	trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_data_return, seq,
-			    rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, ret);
+	trace_rxrpc_recvdata(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_data_return, seq,
+			     rx_pkt_offset, rx_pkt_len, ret);
 	if (ret == -EAGAIN)
 		set_bit(RXRPC_CALL_RX_UNDERRUN, &call->flags);
 	return ret;
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ int rxrpc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 
 	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
 
-	trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(NULL, rxrpc_recvmsg_enter, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+	trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(NULL, rxrpc_recvmsg_enter, 0);
 
 	if (flags & (MSG_OOB | MSG_TRUNC))
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -525,8 +525,7 @@ int rxrpc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 		if (list_empty(&rx->recvmsg_q)) {
 			if (signal_pending(current))
 				goto wait_interrupted;
-			trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(NULL, rxrpc_recvmsg_wait,
-					    0, 0, 0, 0);
+			trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(NULL, rxrpc_recvmsg_wait, 0);
 			timeo = schedule_timeout(timeo);
 		}
 		finish_wait(sk_sleep(&rx->sk), &wait);
@@ -545,7 +544,7 @@ int rxrpc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 		rxrpc_get_call(call, rxrpc_call_got);
 	write_unlock_bh(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
 
-	trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_dequeue, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+	trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_dequeue, 0);
 
 	/* We're going to drop the socket lock, so we need to lock the call
 	 * against interference by sendmsg.
@@ -630,7 +629,7 @@ int rxrpc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 error_unlock_call:
 	mutex_unlock(&call->user_mutex);
 	rxrpc_put_call(call, rxrpc_call_put);
-	trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_return, 0, 0, 0, ret);
+	trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_return, ret);
 	return ret;
 
 error_requeue_call:
@@ -638,14 +637,14 @@ int rxrpc_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 		write_lock_bh(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
 		list_add(&call->recvmsg_link, &rx->recvmsg_q);
 		write_unlock_bh(&rx->recvmsg_lock);
-		trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_requeue, 0, 0, 0, 0);
+		trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_requeue, 0);
 	} else {
 		rxrpc_put_call(call, rxrpc_call_put);
 	}
 error_no_call:
 	release_sock(&rx->sk);
 error_trace:
-	trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_return, 0, 0, 0, ret);
+	trace_rxrpc_recvmsg(call, rxrpc_recvmsg_return, ret);
 	return ret;
 
 wait_interrupted:


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ