netdev - [PATCH bpf v4] bpf: Fix memory leaks in __check_func

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Nov 2022 13:11:31 +0800
From:   Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        <john.fastabend@...il.com>, <andrii@...nel.org>,
        <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, <yhs@...com>, <joe@...d.net.nz>
Subject: [PATCH bpf v4] bpf: Fix memory leaks in __check_func_call

kmemleak reports this issue:

unreferenced object 0xffff88817139d000 (size 2048):
  comm "test_progs", pid 33246, jiffies 4307381979 (age 45851.820s)
  hex dump (first 32 bytes):
    01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
    00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
  backtrace:
    [<0000000045f075f0>] kmalloc_trace+0x27/0xa0
    [<0000000098b7c90a>] __check_func_call+0x316/0x1230
    [<00000000b4c3c403>] check_helper_call+0x172e/0x4700
    [<00000000aa3875b7>] do_check+0x21d8/0x45e0
    [<000000001147357b>] do_check_common+0x767/0xaf0
    [<00000000b5a595b4>] bpf_check+0x43e3/0x5bc0
    [<0000000011e391b1>] bpf_prog_load+0xf26/0x1940
    [<0000000007f765c0>] __sys_bpf+0xd2c/0x3650
    [<00000000839815d6>] __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xc0
    [<00000000946ee250>] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
    [<0000000000506b7f>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

The root case here is: In function prepare_func_exit(), the callee is
not released in the abnormal scenario after "state->curframe--;". To
fix, move "state->curframe--;" to the very bottom of the function,
right when we free callee and reset frame[] pointer to NULL, as Andrii
suggested.

In addition, function __check_func_call() has a similar problem. In
the abnormal scenario before "state->curframe++;", the callee also
should be released by free_func_state().

Fixes: 69c087ba6225 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Fixes: fd978bf7fd31 ("bpf: Add reference tracking to verifier")
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 7f0a9f6..34d8848 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6736,11 +6736,11 @@ static int __check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
 	/* Transfer references to the callee */
 	err = copy_reference_state(callee, caller);
 	if (err)
-		return err;
+		goto err_out;
 
 	err = set_callee_state_cb(env, caller, callee, *insn_idx);
 	if (err)
-		return err;
+		goto err_out;
 
 	clear_caller_saved_regs(env, caller->regs);
 
@@ -6757,6 +6757,11 @@ static int __check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
 		print_verifier_state(env, callee, true);
 	}
 	return 0;
+
+err_out:
+	free_func_state(callee);
+	state->frame[state->curframe + 1] = NULL;
+	return err;
 }
 
 int map_set_for_each_callback_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
@@ -6970,8 +6975,7 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	state->curframe--;
-	caller = state->frame[state->curframe];
+	caller = state->frame[state->curframe - 1];
 	if (callee->in_callback_fn) {
 		/* enforce R0 return value range [0, 1]. */
 		struct tnum range = callee->callback_ret_range;
@@ -7010,7 +7014,7 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
 	}
 	/* clear everything in the callee */
 	free_func_state(callee);
-	state->frame[state->curframe + 1] = NULL;
+	state->frame[state->curframe--] = NULL;
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.3.1