lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2022 11:02:52 +0000
From:   Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To:     Albert Zhou <albert.zhou.50@...il.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/5] Update r8152 to version two

Albert Zhou <albert.zhou.50@...il.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2022 11:34 PM
> Subject: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/5] Update r8152 to version two
> 
> This patch integrates the version-two r8152 drivers from Realtek into
> the kernel. I am new to kernel development, so apologies if I make
> newbie mistakes.

The Realtek's in-house driver doesn't satisfy the rules or requests of
Linux kernel, so I don't think you could use it to replace the Linux
kernel r8152 driver.

The version is used to distinguish between the Realtek's in-house driver
and Linux kernel r8152 driver. It doesn't mean you have to use version 2,
even the version 2 may contain more experiment features.

Best Regards,
Hayes

> I have tested the updated module in v6.1 on my machine, without any
> issues.
> 
> A final note, when I removed all the code for earlier kernel versions,
> the header r8152_compatibility.h reduced dramatically in size. This
> leads me to suspect that some of the headers like <linux/init.h> are no
> longer  needed. However, I left them in there just in case.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists