netdev - Re: [0/1 bpf-next] fix panic bringing up veth with xdp progs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 9 Nov 2022 18:25:50 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc:     daniel@...earbox.net, davem@...emloft.net, ast@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [0/1 bpf-next] fix panic bringing up veth with xdp progs

On Tue,  8 Nov 2022 14:16:49 -0800 John Fastabend wrote:
> Not sure if folks want to take this through BPF tree or networking tree.

Whatever's easiest :) FWIW

Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>

> I took a quick look and didn't see any pending fixes so seems no one
> has noticed the panic yet. It reproducible and easy to repro.
> 
> I put bpf in the title thinking it woudl be great to run through the
> BPF selftests given its XDP triggering the panic.
> 
> Sorry maintainers resent with CC'ing actual lists. Had a scripting
> issue. Also dropped henqqi has they are bouncing.

Adding Paolo, who had comments on this patch in the past.

The entire concept is worth mainintaining in your opinion, I take it?