netdev - [PATCH net-next 2/5] mptcp: change 'first' as a parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20221110232322.125068-3-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Nov 2022 15:23:19 -0800
From:   Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...e.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        matthieu.baerts@...sares.net, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev,
        Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/5] mptcp: change 'first' as a parameter

From: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...e.com>

The function mptcp_subflow_process_delegated() uses the input ssk first,
while __mptcp_check_push() invokes the packet scheduler first.

So this patch adds a new parameter named 'first' for the function
__mptcp_subflow_push_pending() to deal with these two cases separately.

With this change, the code that invokes the packet scheduler in the
function __mptcp_check_push() can be removed, and replaced by invoking
__mptcp_subflow_push_pending() directly.

Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>
---
 net/mptcp/protocol.c | 20 ++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/protocol.c b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
index 64d7070de901..5a344788f843 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.c
@@ -1602,7 +1602,7 @@ void __mptcp_push_pending(struct sock *sk, unsigned int flags)
 		__mptcp_check_send_data_fin(sk);
 }
 
-static void __mptcp_subflow_push_pending(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
+static void __mptcp_subflow_push_pending(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk, bool first)
 {
 	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
 	struct mptcp_sendmsg_info info = {
@@ -1611,7 +1611,6 @@ static void __mptcp_subflow_push_pending(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
 	struct mptcp_data_frag *dfrag;
 	struct sock *xmit_ssk;
 	int len, copied = 0;
-	bool first = true;
 
 	info.flags = 0;
 	while ((dfrag = mptcp_send_head(sk))) {
@@ -1621,8 +1620,7 @@ static void __mptcp_subflow_push_pending(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
 		while (len > 0) {
 			int ret = 0;
 
-			/* the caller already invoked the packet scheduler,
-			 * check for a different subflow usage only after
+			/* check for a different subflow usage only after
 			 * spooling the first chunk of data
 			 */
 			xmit_ssk = first ? ssk : mptcp_subflow_get_send(msk);
@@ -3220,16 +3218,10 @@ void __mptcp_check_push(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
 	if (!mptcp_send_head(sk))
 		return;
 
-	if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
-		struct sock *xmit_ssk = mptcp_subflow_get_send(mptcp_sk(sk));
-
-		if (xmit_ssk == ssk)
-			__mptcp_subflow_push_pending(sk, ssk);
-		else if (xmit_ssk)
-			mptcp_subflow_delegate(mptcp_subflow_ctx(xmit_ssk), MPTCP_DELEGATE_SEND);
-	} else {
+	if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk))
+		__mptcp_subflow_push_pending(sk, ssk, false);
+	else
 		__set_bit(MPTCP_PUSH_PENDING, &mptcp_sk(sk)->cb_flags);
-	}
 }
 
 #define MPTCP_FLAGS_PROCESS_CTX_NEED (BIT(MPTCP_PUSH_PENDING) | \
@@ -3320,7 +3312,7 @@ void mptcp_subflow_process_delegated(struct sock *ssk)
 	if (test_bit(MPTCP_DELEGATE_SEND, &subflow->delegated_status)) {
 		mptcp_data_lock(sk);
 		if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk))
-			__mptcp_subflow_push_pending(sk, ssk);
+			__mptcp_subflow_push_pending(sk, ssk, true);
 		else
 			__set_bit(MPTCP_PUSH_PENDING, &mptcp_sk(sk)->cb_flags);
 		mptcp_data_unlock(sk);
-- 
2.38.1