[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874jv7tlup.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2022 07:33:18 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nbd@....name, john@...ozen.org, sean.wang@...iatek.com,
Mark-MC.Lee@...iatek.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, Bo.Jiao@...iatek.com,
sujuan.chen@...iatek.com, ryder.Lee@...iatek.com,
evelyn.tsai@...iatek.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, daniel@...rotopia.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 0/8] introduce WED RX support to MT7986 SoC
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> writes:
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2022 16:03:40 +0100 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
>> I noticed today the series state is 'Awaiting Upstream'. I am wondering if
>> this series is expected to go through a different tree, e.g. wireless one
>> (adding Kalle in cc). In this particular case the series changes only
>> the mtk ethernet driver and mt76 is built since we modify a common include (but
>> there are no changes in mt76). My personal opinion is this series is suited to
>> go through net-next tree but I would be fine even if it goes through Kalle's
>> one. Any opinions?
>
> Works either way, we'll see what Kalle says.
I would prefer if you can take these to net-next.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists