[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bcb368ce-6a16-ac9d-f2fa-b86b0d4c8ca4@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 14:54:18 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 0/3] Autoload DSA tagging driver when
dynamically changing protocol
On 11/11/22 14:53, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2022 at 10:22:25PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 09:28:41AM +0000, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 11:17:40AM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
>>>> Presuming that backwards compatibility is not an issue, maybe:
>>>> dsa_tag-id-20
>>
>> I don't think they are meant to be human readable.
>>
>> I do however wounder if they should be dsa_tag:ocelot-8021q,
>> dsa_tag:20 ?
>
> dsa_tag:20 or dsa_tag:id-20?
The latter IMHO would be more explicit.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists