lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 20:04:03 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> To: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@...vell.com> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>, Linu Cherian <lcherian@...vell.com>, Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@...vell.com>, Subbaraya Sundeep Bhatta <sbhatta@...vell.com> Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 0/9] CN10KB MAC block support > For "Dropped packets by DMAC filters" did not find any equivalent APIs, so will keep it as is. Nope. Propose a generic netlink API, probably as an extension to ethtool, which other vendors can use as well. This is exactly Jakub and my point. Is your hardware so special it does things which no other vendor does? Is the concept of DMAC filters dropping packets unique to your hardware? Is this feature so obscure that no other vendor will ever implement it? And if it is that obscure, is any user actually going to use it? Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists