[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3GZAEFaO2zp5SbJ@pop-os.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 17:25:20 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: mingkun bian <bianmingkun@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ISSUE] suspicious sock leak
On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 06:22:22PM +0800, mingkun bian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> bpf map1:
> key: cookie
> value: addr daddr sport dport cookie sock*
>
> bpf map2:
> key: sock*
> value: addr daddr sport dport cookie sock*
So none of them is sockmap? Why not use sockmap which takes care
of sock refcnt for you?
>
> 1. Recv a "HTTP GET" request in user applicatoin
> map1.insert(cookie, value)
> map2.insert(sock*, value)
>
> 1. kprobe inet_csk_destroy_sock:
> sk->sk_wmem_queued is 0
> sk->sk_wmem_alloc is 4201
> sk->sk_refcnt is 2
> sk->__sk_common.skc_cookie is 173585924
> saddr daddr sport dport is 192.168.10.x 80
>
> 2. kprobe __sk_free
> can not find the "saddr daddr sport dport 192.168.10.x 80" in kprobe __sk_free
>
> 3. kprobe __sk_free
> after a while, "kprobe __sk_free" find the "saddr daddr sport dport
> 127.0.0.1 xx"' info
> value = map2.find(sock*)
> value1 = map1.find(sock->cookie)
> if (value) {
> map2.delete(sock) //print value info, find "saddr daddr sport
> dport" is "192.168.10.x 80“, and value->cookie is 173585924, which is
> the same as "192.168.10.x 80" 's cookie.
> }
>
> if (value1) {
> map1.delete(sock->cookie)
> }
>
> Here is my test flow, commented lines represents that sock of ”saddr
> daddr sport dport 192.168.10.x 80“ does not come in __sk_free, but it
> is reused by ” saddr daddr sport dport 127.0.0.1 xx"
I don't see this is a problem yet, the struct sock may be still referenced
by the kernel even after you close its corresponding struct socket from
user-space. And TCP sockets have timewait too, so...
I suggest you try sockmap to store sockets instead.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists