[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221114091559.7e24c7de@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 09:15:59 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
Cc: "Mogilappagari, Sudheer" <sudheer.mogilappagari@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"mkubecek@...e.cz" <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ethtool: add netlink based get rxfh support
On Sun, 13 Nov 2022 22:23:25 -0600 Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> > My worry is that if we go with a more broad name like
> > "queue group" someone may be mislead to adding controls
> > unrelated to flow <> queue assignment here.
>
> Later we would like to add a per queue-group parameter that would allow
> reducing/changing the number of napi pollers for a queue group from the default
> value equal to the number of queues in the queue group. Are you suggesting
> creating a queue-group object and use devlink API to configure such parameters
> for a queue-group?
I was thinking devlink because of scheduler/QoS and resource control.
For NAPI config not so sure, but either way RSS will not be a place
for NAPI/IRQ config.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists