| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <00000000000023209305ed71c833@google.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 09:43:48 -0800
From: syzbot <syzbot+8768e9ec924b08e63f82@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org, kuba@...nel.org, linma@....edu.cn,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: [syzbot] possible deadlock in nci_set_local_general_bytes
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit: 1621b6eaebf7 Merge branch 'for-next/fixes' into for-kernelci
git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=119413e1880000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=606e57fd25c5c6cc
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8768e9ec924b08e63f82
compiler: Debian clang version 13.0.1-++20220126092033+75e33f71c2da-1~exp1~20220126212112.63, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
userspace arch: arm64
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1097e935880000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=177b5b15880000
Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/82aa7741098d/disk-1621b6ea.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f6be08c4e4c2/vmlinux-1621b6ea.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/296b6946258a/Image-1621b6ea.gz.xz
IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+8768e9ec924b08e63f82@...kaller.appspotmail.com
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.1.0-rc4-syzkaller-31872-g1621b6eaebf7 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor402/3146 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff0000cad76350 (&ndev->req_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: nci_request net/nfc/nci/core.c:148 [inline]
ffff0000cad76350 (&ndev->req_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: nci_set_local_general_bytes+0xbc/0x480 net/nfc/nci/core.c:774
but task is already holding lock:
ffff0000cad73d18 (&genl_data->genl_data_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: nfc_genl_start_poll+0xc4/0x174 net/nfc/netlink.c:826
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 (&genl_data->genl_data_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common+0xd4/0xca8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
nfc_urelease_event_work+0x88/0x16c net/nfc/netlink.c:1811
process_one_work+0x2d8/0x504 kernel/workqueue.c:2289
worker_thread+0x340/0x610 kernel/workqueue.c:2436
kthread+0x12c/0x158 kernel/kthread.c:376
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:863
-> #2 (nfc_devlist_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common+0xd4/0xca8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
nfc_register_device+0x34/0x208 net/nfc/core.c:1116
nci_register_device+0x338/0x3b0 net/nfc/nci/core.c:1256
virtual_ncidev_open+0x6c/0xd8 drivers/nfc/virtual_ncidev.c:146
misc_open+0x1b8/0x200 drivers/char/misc.c:143
chrdev_open+0x2b4/0x2e8 fs/char_dev.c:414
do_dentry_open+0x364/0x748 fs/open.c:882
vfs_open+0x38/0x48 fs/open.c:1013
do_open fs/namei.c:3557 [inline]
path_openat+0xe34/0x11c4 fs/namei.c:3713
do_filp_open+0xdc/0x1b8 fs/namei.c:3740
do_sys_openat2+0xb8/0x22c fs/open.c:1310
do_sys_open fs/open.c:1326 [inline]
__do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1342 [inline]
__se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1337 [inline]
__arm64_sys_openat+0xb0/0xe0 fs/open.c:1337
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:655
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584
-> #1 (nci_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
__mutex_lock_common+0xd4/0xca8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
virtual_nci_close+0x28/0x58 drivers/nfc/virtual_ncidev.c:44
nci_open_device+0x414/0x518 net/nfc/nci/core.c:544
nci_dev_up+0x20/0x30 net/nfc/nci/core.c:631
nfc_dev_up+0xcc/0x1b0 net/nfc/core.c:118
nfc_genl_dev_up+0x40/0x78 net/nfc/netlink.c:770
genl_family_rcv_msg_doit net/netlink/genetlink.c:756 [inline]
genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:833 [inline]
genl_rcv_msg+0x458/0x4f4 net/netlink/genetlink.c:850
netlink_rcv_skb+0xe8/0x1d4 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2540
genl_rcv+0x38/0x50 net/netlink/genetlink.c:861
netlink_unicast_kernel+0xfc/0x1dc net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319
netlink_unicast+0x164/0x248 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345
netlink_sendmsg+0x484/0x584 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline]
sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:734 [inline]
____sys_sendmsg+0x2f8/0x440 net/socket.c:2482
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2536 [inline]
__sys_sendmsg+0x1ac/0x228 net/socket.c:2565
__do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2574 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2572 [inline]
__arm64_sys_sendmsg+0x2c/0x3c net/socket.c:2572
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:655
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584
-> #0 (&ndev->req_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x3084 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
__mutex_lock_common+0xd4/0xca8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
nci_request net/nfc/nci/core.c:148 [inline]
nci_set_local_general_bytes+0xbc/0x480 net/nfc/nci/core.c:774
nci_start_poll+0x1e8/0x474 net/nfc/nci/core.c:838
nfc_start_poll+0xfc/0x170 net/nfc/core.c:225
nfc_genl_start_poll+0xd4/0x174 net/nfc/netlink.c:828
genl_family_rcv_msg_doit net/netlink/genetlink.c:756 [inline]
genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:833 [inline]
genl_rcv_msg+0x458/0x4f4 net/netlink/genetlink.c:850
netlink_rcv_skb+0xe8/0x1d4 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2540
genl_rcv+0x38/0x50 net/netlink/genetlink.c:861
netlink_unicast_kernel+0xfc/0x1dc net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319
netlink_unicast+0x164/0x248 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345
netlink_sendmsg+0x484/0x584 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline]
sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:734 [inline]
____sys_sendmsg+0x2f8/0x440 net/socket.c:2482
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2536 [inline]
__sys_sendmsg+0x1ac/0x228 net/socket.c:2565
__do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2574 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2572 [inline]
__arm64_sys_sendmsg+0x2c/0x3c net/socket.c:2572
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:655
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&ndev->req_lock --> nfc_devlist_mutex --> &genl_data->genl_data_mutex
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&genl_data->genl_data_mutex);
lock(nfc_devlist_mutex);
lock(&genl_data->genl_data_mutex);
lock(&ndev->req_lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
4 locks held by syz-executor402/3146:
#0: ffff80000d7c9268 (cb_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv+0x28/0x50 net/netlink/genetlink.c:860
#1: ffff80000d7c9178 (genl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: genl_lock net/netlink/genetlink.c:33 [inline]
#1: ffff80000d7c9178 (genl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: genl_rcv_msg+0x80/0x4f4 net/netlink/genetlink.c:848
#2: ffff0000cad73d18 (&genl_data->genl_data_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: nfc_genl_start_poll+0xc4/0x174 net/nfc/netlink.c:826
#3: ffff0000cad73900 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: device_lock include/linux/device.h:835 [inline]
#3: ffff0000cad73900 (&dev->mutex){....}-{3:3}, at: nfc_start_poll+0x5c/0x170 net/nfc/core.c:208
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 3146 Comm: syz-executor402 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4-syzkaller-31872-g1621b6eaebf7 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/30/2022
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x1c4/0x1f0 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:156
show_stack+0x2c/0x54 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:163
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x104/0x16c lib/dump_stack.c:106
dump_stack+0x1c/0x58 lib/dump_stack.c:113
print_circular_bug+0x2c4/0x2c8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2055
check_noncircular+0x14c/0x154 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2177
check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3097 [inline]
check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3216 [inline]
validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3831 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x1530/0x3084 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5055
lock_acquire+0x100/0x1f8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5668
__mutex_lock_common+0xd4/0xca8 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
__mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
mutex_lock_nested+0x38/0x44 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
nci_request net/nfc/nci/core.c:148 [inline]
nci_set_local_general_bytes+0xbc/0x480 net/nfc/nci/core.c:774
nci_start_poll+0x1e8/0x474 net/nfc/nci/core.c:838
nfc_start_poll+0xfc/0x170 net/nfc/core.c:225
nfc_genl_start_poll+0xd4/0x174 net/nfc/netlink.c:828
genl_family_rcv_msg_doit net/netlink/genetlink.c:756 [inline]
genl_family_rcv_msg net/netlink/genetlink.c:833 [inline]
genl_rcv_msg+0x458/0x4f4 net/netlink/genetlink.c:850
netlink_rcv_skb+0xe8/0x1d4 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2540
genl_rcv+0x38/0x50 net/netlink/genetlink.c:861
netlink_unicast_kernel+0xfc/0x1dc net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1319
netlink_unicast+0x164/0x248 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1345
netlink_sendmsg+0x484/0x584 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1921
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:714 [inline]
sock_sendmsg net/socket.c:734 [inline]
____sys_sendmsg+0x2f8/0x440 net/socket.c:2482
___sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2536 [inline]
__sys_sendmsg+0x1ac/0x228 net/socket.c:2565
__do_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2574 [inline]
__se_sys_sendmsg net/socket.c:2572 [inline]
__arm64_sys_sendmsg+0x2c/0x3c net/socket.c:2572
__invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline]
invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 [inline]
el0_svc_common+0x138/0x220 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142
do_el0_svc+0x48/0x164 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:206
el0_svc+0x58/0x150 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:637
el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xf0 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:655
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:584
nci: __nci_request: wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout failed -512
nci: nci_start_poll: failed to set local general bytes
nci: __nci_request: wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout failed 0
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.
syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.
syzbot can test patches for this issue, for details see:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists