lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABBYNZJ-BjuUcriLpNzs95SDqXP+_6-LJZ-t_00Q6ppy8qYg2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Nov 2022 14:05:24 -0800
From:   Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
To:     Sungwoo Kim <iam@...g-woo.kim>
Cc:     marcel@...tmann.org, johan.hedberg@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: L2CAP: Spec violation

Hi Kim,

On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 9:13 AM Sungwoo Kim <iam@...g-woo.kim> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Our fuzzer found a BT spec violation, illegal state transition on L2cap.
> Specifically, l2cap_chan::state is transitioned from BT_CONFIG to
> BT_DISCONN by CONFIG_RSP by following trace:
>
> l2cap_config_rsp l2cap_core.c:4498
> l2cap_send_disconn_req l2cap_core.c:4585
> l2cap_state_change l2cap_core.c:1618
>
> According to the spec 5.3 vol.3 part A 6.1.4, CONFIG_RSP cannot cause
> that transition, i.e., CONFIG -> DISCONN by CONFIG_RSP is illegal.
> It'd be great if we could discuss.

Can you include some btmon traces?


-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ