[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221114234250.3039889-2-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 15:42:44 -0800
From: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com
Cc: Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
richardcochran@...il.com, Gurucharan G <gurucharanx.g@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/7] ice: Check for PTP HW lock more frequently
From: Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@...el.com>
It was observed that PTP HW semaphore can be held for ~50 ms in worst
case.
SW should wait longer and check more frequently if the HW lock is held.
Signed-off-by: Karol Kolacinski <karol.kolacinski@...el.com>
Tested-by: Gurucharan G <gurucharanx.g@...el.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel)
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
index 772b1f566d6e..1f8dd50db524 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_ptp_hw.c
@@ -2963,16 +2963,18 @@ bool ice_ptp_lock(struct ice_hw *hw)
u32 hw_lock;
int i;
-#define MAX_TRIES 5
+#define MAX_TRIES 15
for (i = 0; i < MAX_TRIES; i++) {
hw_lock = rd32(hw, PFTSYN_SEM + (PFTSYN_SEM_BYTES * hw->pf_id));
hw_lock = hw_lock & PFTSYN_SEM_BUSY_M;
- if (!hw_lock)
- break;
+ if (hw_lock) {
+ /* Somebody is holding the lock */
+ usleep_range(5000, 6000);
+ continue;
+ }
- /* Somebody is holding the lock */
- usleep_range(10000, 20000);
+ break;
}
return !hw_lock;
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists