lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2022 10:42:50 +0000
From:   "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Corentin LABBE <clabbe@...libre.com>, andrew@...n.ch,
        calvin.johnson@....nxp.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, hkallweit1@...il.com,
        jernej.skrabec@...il.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        kuba@...nel.org, lgirdwood@...il.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, samuel@...lland.org, wens@...e.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] regulator: Add of_regulator_bulk_get_all

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 10:34:41AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 11:18:50AM +0100, Corentin LABBE wrote:
> > Le Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 10:03:14AM +0000, Mark Brown a écrit :
> 
> > > What's the use case - why would a device not know which supplies
> > > it requires?  This just looks like an invitation to badly written
> > > consumers TBH.
> 
> > The device know which supply it have, but I found only this way to made all maintainers happy.
> > See https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/0518eef1-75a6-fbfe-96d8-bb1fc4e5178a@linaro.org/t/#m7a2e012f4c7c7058478811929774ab2af9bfcbf6
> 
> Well, it's not making this maintainer happy :/  If we know what
> PHY is there why not just look up the set of supplies based on
> the compatible of the PHY?

It looks to me like this series fetches the regulators before the PHY
is bound to the driver, so what you're proposing would mean that the
core PHY code would need a table of all compatibles (which is pretty
hard to do, they encode the vendor/device ID, not some descriptive
name) and then a list of the regulator names. IMHO that doesn't scale.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ