netdev - Re: [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next 05/11] veth: Support rx timestamp metadata for xdp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKH8qBsEGD3L0XAVzVHcTW6k_RhEt74pfXrPLANuznSAJw7bEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 15 Nov 2022 10:37:43 -0800
From:   Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
To:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
        andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
        yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
        Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@...el.com>,
        Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
        Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>,
        Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@...hat.com>, xdp-hints@...-project.net,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next 05/11] veth: Support rx timestamp
 metadata for xdp

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 8:17 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com> writes:
>
> > The goal is to enable end-to-end testing of the metadata
> > for AF_XDP. Current rx_timestamp kfunc returns current
> > time which should be enough to exercise this new functionality.
> >
> > Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
> > Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> > Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> > Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@...el.com>
> > Cc: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>
> > Cc: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>
> > Cc: Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@...hat.com>
> > Cc: xdp-hints@...-project.net
> > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/veth.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/veth.c b/drivers/net/veth.c
> > index 2a4592780141..c626580a2294 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/veth.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
> > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/filter.h>
> >  #include <linux/ptr_ring.h>
> >  #include <linux/bpf_trace.h>
> > +#include <linux/bpf_patch.h>
> >  #include <linux/net_tstamp.h>
> >
> >  #define DRV_NAME     "veth"
> > @@ -1659,6 +1660,18 @@ static int veth_xdp(struct net_device *dev, struct netdev_bpf *xdp)
> >       }
> >  }
> >
> > +static void veth_unroll_kfunc(const struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 func_id,
> > +                           struct bpf_patch *patch)
> > +{
> > +     if (func_id == xdp_metadata_kfunc_id(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_TIMESTAMP_SUPPORTED)) {
> > +             /* return true; */
> > +             bpf_patch_append(patch, BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1));
> > +     } else if (func_id == xdp_metadata_kfunc_id(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_TIMESTAMP)) {
> > +             /* return ktime_get_mono_fast_ns(); */
> > +             bpf_patch_append(patch, BPF_EMIT_CALL(ktime_get_mono_fast_ns));
> > +     }
> > +}
>
> So these look reasonable enough, but would be good to see some examples
> of kfunc implementations that don't just BPF_CALL to a kernel function
> (with those helper wrappers we were discussing before).

Let's maybe add them if/when needed as we add more metadata support?
xdp_metadata_export_to_skb has an example, and rfc 1/2 have more
examples, so it shouldn't be a problem to resurrect them back at some
point?