[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <708663f3-8e48-5e0d-a988-8d66ede02543@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 19:55:24 +0100
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: dsa: use more appropriate NET_NAME_* constants
for user ports
On 15/11/2022 17.38, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 08:43:55 +0100 Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> + if (port->name) {
>> + name = port->name;
>> + assign_type = NET_NAME_PREDICTABLE;
>> + } else {
>> + name = "eth%d";
>> + assign_type = NET_NAME_ENUM;
>
> Per Andrew's comment lets make the change in two steps.
> Which one should come first is a judgment call :)
OK. I think I'll actually do it in three steps, with the first being
this patch but with NET_NAME_UNKNOWN kept in both places (i.e. pure
refactoring), and the latter two just changing one assign_type at a
time, so they can be reverted independently.
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists