[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y3M5DOEhbAdbCtEC@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 08:00:28 +0100
From: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
"Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"jiri@...dia.com" <jiri@...dia.com>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"Lobakin, Alexandr" <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>,
"Drewek, Wojciech" <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>,
"Czapnik, Lukasz" <lukasz.czapnik@...el.com>,
"Saleem, Shiraz" <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
"Ismail, Mustafa" <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>,
"Kitszel, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
"Raczynski, Piotr" <piotr.raczynski@...el.com>,
"Ertman, David M" <david.m.ertman@...el.com>,
"Kaliszczuk, Leszek" <leszek.kaliszczuk@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/13] resource management using devlink reload
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 07:09:36PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 04:58:57PM +0000, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Samudrala, Sridhar <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, November 14, 2022 7:31 AM
> > > To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>; Michal Swiatkowski
> > > <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org;
> > > pabeni@...hat.com; edumazet@...gle.com; intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org;
> > > jiri@...dia.com; Nguyen, Anthony L <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>; Lobakin,
> > > Alexandr <alexandr.lobakin@...el.com>; Drewek, Wojciech
> > > <wojciech.drewek@...el.com>; Czapnik, Lukasz <lukasz.czapnik@...el.com>;
> > > Saleem, Shiraz <shiraz.saleem@...el.com>; Brandeburg, Jesse
> > > <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>; Ismail, Mustafa <mustafa.ismail@...el.com>;
> > > Kitszel, Przemyslaw <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>; Raczynski, Piotr
> > > <piotr.raczynski@...el.com>; Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>; Ertman,
> > > David M <david.m.ertman@...el.com>; Kaliszczuk, Leszek
> > > <leszek.kaliszczuk@...el.com>
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/13] resource management using devlink reload
> > >
> > > On 11/14/2022 7:23 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 01:57:42PM +0100, Michal Swiatkowski wrote:
> > > >> Currently the default value for number of PF vectors is number of CPUs.
> > > >> Because of that there are cases when all vectors are used for PF
> > > >> and user can't create more VFs. It is hard to set default number of
> > > >> CPUs right for all different use cases. Instead allow user to choose
> > > >> how many vectors should be used for various features. After implementing
> > > >> subdevices this mechanism will be also used to set number of vectors
> > > >> for subfunctions.
> > > >>
> > > >> The idea is to set vectors for eth or VFs using devlink resource API.
> > > >> New value of vectors will be used after devlink reinit. Example
> > > >> commands:
> > > >> $ sudo devlink resource set pci/0000:31:00.0 path msix/msix_eth size 16
> > > >> $ sudo devlink dev reload pci/0000:31:00.0
> > > >> After reload driver will work with 16 vectors used for eth instead of
> > > >> num_cpus.
> > > > By saying "vectors", are you referring to MSI-X vectors?
> > > > If yes, you have specific interface for that.
> > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20210314124256.70253-1-leon@kernel.org/
> > >
> > > This patch series is exposing a resources API to split the device level MSI-X vectors
> > > across the different functions supported by the device (PF, RDMA, SR-IOV VFs
> > > and
> > > in future subfunctions). Today this is all hidden in a policy implemented within
> > > the PF driver.
> > >
> > > The patch you are referring to seems to be providing an interface to change the
> > > msix count for a particular VF. This patch is providing a interface to set the total
> > > msix count for all the possible VFs from the available device level pool of
> > > msix-vectors.
> > >
> >
> > It looks like we should implement both: resources to configure the "pool" of available vectors for each VF, and the sysfs VF Interface to allow configuring individual VFs.
>
> Yes, to be aligned with PCI spec and see coherent lspci output for VFs.
>
> Thanks
>
Thanks, I will implement this sysf interface to configure individual
VFs.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jake
Powered by blists - more mailing lists