netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/7] RDMA/hfi1: don't pass bogus GFP_ flags to dma_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <be8ca3f9-b7f7-5402-0cfc-47b9985e007b@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2022 15:15:10 +0000
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     Dean Luick <dean.luick@...nelisnetworks.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux.dev, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] RDMA/hfi1: don't pass bogus GFP_ flags to
 dma_alloc_coherent

On 2022-11-16 14:40, Dean Luick wrote:
> On 11/13/2022 10:35 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> dma_alloc_coherent is an opaque allocator that only uses the GFP_ flags
>> for allocation context control.  Don't pass GFP_USER which doesn't make
>> sense for a kernel DMA allocation or __GFP_COMP which makes no sense
>> for an allocation that can't in any way be converted to a page pointer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>> ---
>>   drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/init.c | 21 +++------------------
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/init.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/init.c
>> index 436372b314312..24c0f0d257fc9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/init.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/init.c
>> @@ -1761,17 +1761,11 @@ int hfi1_create_rcvhdrq(struct hfi1_devdata *dd, struct hfi1_ctxtdata *rcd)
>>        unsigned amt;
>>
>>        if (!rcd->rcvhdrq) {
>> -             gfp_t gfp_flags;
>> -
>>                amt = rcvhdrq_size(rcd);
>>
>> -             if (rcd->ctxt < dd->first_dyn_alloc_ctxt || rcd->is_vnic)
>> -                     gfp_flags = GFP_KERNEL;
>> -             else
>> -                     gfp_flags = GFP_USER;
>>                rcd->rcvhdrq = dma_alloc_coherent(&dd->pcidev->dev, amt,
>>                                                  &rcd->rcvhdrq_dma,
>> -                                               gfp_flags | __GFP_COMP);
>> +                                               GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> A user context receive header queue may be mapped into user space.  Is that not the use case for GFP_USER?  The above conditional is what decides.
> 
> Why do you think GFP_USER should be removed here?

Coherent DMA buffers are allocated by a kernel driver or subsystem for 
the use of a device managed by that driver or subsystem, and thus they 
fundamentally belong to the kernel as proxy for the device. Any coherent 
DMA buffer may be mapped to userspace with the dma_mmap_*() interfaces, 
but they're never a "userspace allocation" in that sense.

Thanks,
Robin.