[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221116102102.72599e40@hermes.local>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 10:21:02 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 1/2] tc: ct: Fix ct commit nat forcing addr
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 09:33:11 +0200
Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com> wrote:
> Action ct commit should accept nat src/dst without an addr. Fix it.
>
> Fixes: c8a494314c40 ("tc: Introduce tc ct action")
> Signed-off-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>
> ---
> man/man8/tc-ct.8 | 2 +-
> tc/m_ct.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/man/man8/tc-ct.8 b/man/man8/tc-ct.8
> index 2fb81ca29aa4..78d05e430c36 100644
> --- a/man/man8/tc-ct.8
> +++ b/man/man8/tc-ct.8
> @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Specify a masked 32bit mark to set for the connection (only valid with commit).
> Specify a masked 128bit label to set for the connection (only valid with commit).
> .TP
> .BI nat " NAT_SPEC"
> -.BI Where " NAT_SPEC " ":= {src|dst} addr" " addr1" "[-" "addr2" "] [port " "port1" "[-" "port2" "]]"
> +.BI Where " NAT_SPEC " ":= {src|dst} [addr" " addr1" "[-" "addr2" "] [port " "port1" "[-" "port2" "]]]"
>
> Specify src/dst and range of nat to configure for the connection (only valid with commit).
> .RS
> diff --git a/tc/m_ct.c b/tc/m_ct.c
> index a02bf0cc1655..1b8984075a67 100644
> --- a/tc/m_ct.c
> +++ b/tc/m_ct.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ usage(void)
> " ct commit [force] [zone ZONE] [mark MASKED_MARK] [label MASKED_LABEL] [nat NAT_SPEC]\n"
> " ct [nat] [zone ZONE]\n"
> "Where: ZONE is the conntrack zone table number\n"
> - " NAT_SPEC is {src|dst} addr addr1[-addr2] [port port1[-port2]]\n"
> + " NAT_SPEC is {src|dst} [addr addr1[-addr2] [port port1[-port2]]]\n"
> "\n");
> exit(-1);
> }
> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ parse_ct(struct action_util *a, int *argc_p, char ***argv_p, int tca_id,
>
> NEXT_ARG();
> if (matches(*argv, "addr") != 0)
> - usage();
> + continue;
>
This confuses me. Doing continue here will cause the current argument to be reprocessed so
it would expect it to be zone | nat | clear | commit | force | index | mark | label
which is not right.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists