netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/13] resource management using devlink reload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y3R9iAMtkk8zGyaC@unreal>
Date:   Wed, 16 Nov 2022 08:04:56 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
Cc:     Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, jiri@...dia.com,
        anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, alexandr.lobakin@...el.com,
        wojciech.drewek@...el.com, lukasz.czapnik@...el.com,
        shiraz.saleem@...el.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
        mustafa.ismail@...el.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com,
        piotr.raczynski@...el.com, jacob.e.keller@...el.com,
        david.m.ertman@...el.com, leszek.kaliszczuk@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/13] resource management using devlink reload

On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 07:59:06PM -0600, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> On 11/15/2022 11:57 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:

<...>

> > > In case of ice driver lspci -vs shows:
> > > Capabilities: [70] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=1024 Masked
> > > 
> > > so all vectors that hw supports (PFs, VFs, misc, etc). Because of that
> > > total number of MSI-X in the devlink example from cover letter is 1024.
> > > 
> > > I see that mellanox shows:
> > > Capabilities: [9c] MSI-X: Enable+ Count=64 Masked
> > > 
> > > I assume that 64 is in this case MSI-X ony for this one PF (it make
> > > sense).
> > Yes and PF MSI-X count can be changed through FW configuration tool, as
> > we need to write new value when the driver is unbound and we need it to
> > be persistent. Users are expecting to see "stable" number any time they
> > reboot the server. It is not the case for VFs, as they are explicitly
> > created after reboots and start "fresh" after every boot.
> > 
> > So we set large enough but not too large value as a default for PFs.
> > If you find sane model of how to change it through kernel, you can count
> > on our support.
> 
> I guess one main difference is that in case of ice, PF driver manager resources
> for all its associated functions, not the FW. So the MSI-X count reported for PF
> shows the total vectors(PF netdev, VFs, rdma, SFs). VFs talk to PF over a mailbox
> to get their MSI-X vector information.

What is the output of lspci for ice VF when the driver is not bound?

Thanks

> 
> 
>