netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] NFC: nci: Extend virtual NCI deinit test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACT4Y+agc1=bzeWKQS_Mo_bfZAaj_w4qNgH-1GsUVbr6XbdZzQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2022 17:29:05 +0100
From:   Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To:     Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc:     bongsu.jeon@...sung.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller@...glegroups.com,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] NFC: nci: Extend virtual NCI deinit test

On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 at 15:58, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2022-11-15 at 10:59 +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > > > Extend the test to check the scenario when NCI core tries to send data
> > > > to already closed device to ensure that nothing bad happens.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> > > > Cc: Bongsu Jeon <bongsu.jeon@...sung.com>
> > > > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> > > > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> > > > Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> > > > ---
> > > >  tools/testing/selftests/nci/nci_dev.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > > >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nci/nci_dev.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nci/nci_dev.c
> > > > index 162c41e9bcae8..272958a4ad102 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nci/nci_dev.c
> > > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nci/nci_dev.c
> > > > @@ -888,6 +888,16 @@ TEST_F(NCI, deinit)
> > > >                          &msg);
> > > >       ASSERT_EQ(rc, 0);
> > > >       EXPECT_EQ(get_dev_enable_state(&msg), 0);
> > > > +
> > > > +     // Test that operations that normally send packets to the driver
> > > > +     // don't cause issues when the device is already closed.
> > > > +     // Note: the send of NFC_CMD_DEV_UP itself still succeeds it's just
> > > > +     // that the device won't actually be up.
> > > > +     close(self->virtual_nci_fd);
> > > > +     self->virtual_nci_fd = -1;
> > >
> > > I think you need to handle correctly negative value of virtual_nci_fd
> > > in FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(NCI), otherwise it should trigger an assert on
> > > pthread_join() - read() operation will fail in virtual_deinit*()
> >
> > Hi Paolo,
> >
> > In this test we also set self->open_state = 0. This will make
> > FIXTURE_TEARDOWN(NCI) skip all of the deinit code. It will still do
> > close(self->virtual_nci_fd) w/o checking the return value. So it will
> > be close(-1), which will return an error, but we won't check it.
>
> Thanks for the pointer. The code looks indeed correct.
>
> And sorry for the late nit picking, but I guess it's better to avoid
> the '//' comment marker and use instead the multi-line ones.

Right. I am used to a different style and checkpatch did not complain. Sent v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221117162101.1467069-1-dvyukov@google.com/