lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aed09115-cfd8-1986-a848-bb33d2743def@digikod.net>
Date:   Thu, 17 Nov 2022 19:42:08 +0100
From:   Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To:     Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc:     willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, gnoack3000@...il.com,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, artem.kuzin@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 04/12] landlock: Move unmask_layers() and
 init_layer_masks()


On 21/10/2022 17:26, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
> This patch moves unmask_layers() and init_layer_masks() helpers
> to ruleset.c to share with landlock network implementation in

…to share them with the Landlock network implementation in


> following commits.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes since v7:
> * Refactors commit message.
> 
> Changes since v6:
> * Moves get_handled_accesses() helper from ruleset.c back to fs.c,
>    cause it's not used in coming network commits.
> 
> Changes since v5:
> * Splits commit.
> * Moves init_layer_masks() and get_handled_accesses() helpers
> to ruleset.c and makes then non-static.
> * Formats code with clang-format-14.
> 
> ---
>   security/landlock/fs.c      | 103 ------------------------------------
>   security/landlock/ruleset.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   security/landlock/ruleset.h |  20 +++++++
>   3 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/landlock/fs.c b/security/landlock/fs.c
> index 710cfa1306de..240e42a8f788 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/fs.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/fs.c
> @@ -226,60 +226,6 @@ find_rule(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
>   	return rule;
>   }
> 
> -/*
> - * @layer_masks is read and may be updated according to the access request and
> - * the matching rule.
> - *
> - * Returns true if the request is allowed (i.e. relevant layer masks for the
> - * request are empty).
> - */
> -static inline bool
> -unmask_layers(const struct landlock_rule *const rule,
> -	      const access_mask_t access_request,
> -	      layer_mask_t (*const layer_masks)[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS])
> -{
> -	size_t layer_level;
> -
> -	if (!access_request || !layer_masks)
> -		return true;
> -	if (!rule)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * An access is granted if, for each policy layer, at least one rule
> -	 * encountered on the pathwalk grants the requested access,
> -	 * regardless of its position in the layer stack.  We must then check
> -	 * the remaining layers for each inode, from the first added layer to
> -	 * the last one.  When there is multiple requested accesses, for each
> -	 * policy layer, the full set of requested accesses may not be granted
> -	 * by only one rule, but by the union (binary OR) of multiple rules.
> -	 * E.g. /a/b <execute> + /a <read> => /a/b <execute + read>
> -	 */
> -	for (layer_level = 0; layer_level < rule->num_layers; layer_level++) {
> -		const struct landlock_layer *const layer =
> -			&rule->layers[layer_level];
> -		const layer_mask_t layer_bit = BIT_ULL(layer->level - 1);
> -		const unsigned long access_req = access_request;
> -		unsigned long access_bit;
> -		bool is_empty;
> -
> -		/*
> -		 * Records in @layer_masks which layer grants access to each
> -		 * requested access.
> -		 */
> -		is_empty = true;
> -		for_each_set_bit(access_bit, &access_req,
> -				 ARRAY_SIZE(*layer_masks)) {
> -			if (layer->access & BIT_ULL(access_bit))
> -				(*layer_masks)[access_bit] &= ~layer_bit;
> -			is_empty = is_empty && !(*layer_masks)[access_bit];
> -		}
> -		if (is_empty)
> -			return true;
> -	}
> -	return false;
> -}
> -
>   /*
>    * Allows access to pseudo filesystems that will never be mountable (e.g.
>    * sockfs, pipefs), but can still be reachable through
> @@ -303,55 +249,6 @@ get_handled_accesses(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain)
>   	return access_dom & LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS;
>   }
> 
> -/**
> - * init_layer_masks - Initialize layer masks from an access request
> - *
> - * Populates @layer_masks such that for each access right in @access_request,
> - * the bits for all the layers are set where this access right is handled.
> - *
> - * @domain: The domain that defines the current restrictions.
> - * @access_request: The requested access rights to check.
> - * @layer_masks: The layer masks to populate.
> - *
> - * Returns: An access mask where each access right bit is set which is handled
> - * in any of the active layers in @domain.
> - */
> -static inline access_mask_t
> -init_layer_masks(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
> -		 const access_mask_t access_request,
> -		 layer_mask_t (*const layer_masks)[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS])
> -{
> -	access_mask_t handled_accesses = 0;
> -	size_t layer_level;
> -
> -	memset(layer_masks, 0, sizeof(*layer_masks));
> -	/* An empty access request can happen because of O_WRONLY | O_RDWR. */
> -	if (!access_request)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	/* Saves all handled accesses per layer. */
> -	for (layer_level = 0; layer_level < domain->num_layers; layer_level++) {
> -		const unsigned long access_req = access_request;
> -		unsigned long access_bit;
> -
> -		for_each_set_bit(access_bit, &access_req,
> -				 ARRAY_SIZE(*layer_masks)) {
> -			/*
> -			 * Artificially handles all initially denied by default
> -			 * access rights.
> -			 */
> -			if (BIT_ULL(access_bit) &
> -			    (landlock_get_fs_access_mask(domain, layer_level) |
> -			     ACCESS_INITIALLY_DENIED)) {
> -				(*layer_masks)[access_bit] |=
> -					BIT_ULL(layer_level);
> -				handled_accesses |= BIT_ULL(access_bit);
> -			}
> -		}
> -	}
> -	return handled_accesses;
> -}
> -
>   /*
>    * Check that a destination file hierarchy has more restrictions than a source
>    * file hierarchy.  This is only used for link and rename actions.
> diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.c b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> index 961ffe0c709e..02ab14439c43 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> +++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.c
> @@ -572,3 +572,105 @@ landlock_find_rule(const struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
>   	}
>   	return NULL;
>   }
> +
> +/*
> + * @layer_masks is read and may be updated according to the access request and
> + * the matching rule.
> + *
> + * Returns true if the request is allowed (i.e. relevant layer masks for the
> + * request are empty).
> + */
> +bool unmask_layers(const struct landlock_rule *const rule,
> +		   const access_mask_t access_request,
> +		   layer_mask_t (*const layer_masks)[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS])
> +{
> +	size_t layer_level;
> +
> +	if (!access_request || !layer_masks)
> +		return true;
> +	if (!rule)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * An access is granted if, for each policy layer, at least one rule
> +	 * encountered on the pathwalk grants the requested access,
> +	 * regardless of its position in the layer stack.  We must then check
> +	 * the remaining layers for each inode, from the first added layer to
> +	 * the last one.  When there is multiple requested accesses, for each
> +	 * policy layer, the full set of requested accesses may not be granted
> +	 * by only one rule, but by the union (binary OR) of multiple rules.
> +	 * E.g. /a/b <execute> + /a <read> => /a/b <execute + read>
> +	 */
> +	for (layer_level = 0; layer_level < rule->num_layers; layer_level++) {
> +		const struct landlock_layer *const layer =
> +			&rule->layers[layer_level];
> +		const layer_mask_t layer_bit = BIT_ULL(layer->level - 1);
> +		const unsigned long access_req = access_request;
> +		unsigned long access_bit;
> +		bool is_empty;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Records in @layer_masks which layer grants access to each
> +		 * requested access.
> +		 */
> +		is_empty = true;
> +		for_each_set_bit(access_bit, &access_req,
> +				 ARRAY_SIZE(*layer_masks)) {
> +			if (layer->access & BIT_ULL(access_bit))
> +				(*layer_masks)[access_bit] &= ~layer_bit;
> +			is_empty = is_empty && !(*layer_masks)[access_bit];
> +		}
> +		if (is_empty)
> +			return true;
> +	}
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * init_layer_masks - Initialize layer masks from an access request
> + *
> + * Populates @layer_masks such that for each access right in @access_request,
> + * the bits for all the layers are set where this access right is handled.
> + *
> + * @domain: The domain that defines the current restrictions.
> + * @access_request: The requested access rights to check.
> + * @layer_masks: The layer masks to populate.
> + *
> + * Returns: An access mask where each access right bit is set which is handled
> + * in any of the active layers in @domain.
> + */
> +access_mask_t
> +init_layer_masks(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
> +		 const access_mask_t access_request,
> +		 layer_mask_t (*const layer_masks)[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS])
> +{
> +	access_mask_t handled_accesses = 0;
> +	size_t layer_level;
> +
> +	memset(layer_masks, 0, sizeof(*layer_masks));
> +	/* An empty access request can happen because of O_WRONLY | O_RDWR. */
> +	if (!access_request)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* Saves all handled accesses per layer. */
> +	for (layer_level = 0; layer_level < domain->num_layers; layer_level++) {
> +		const unsigned long access_req = access_request;
> +		unsigned long access_bit;
> +
> +		for_each_set_bit(access_bit, &access_req,
> +				 ARRAY_SIZE(*layer_masks)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Artificially handles all initially denied by default
> +			 * access rights.
> +			 */
> +			if (BIT_ULL(access_bit) &
> +			    (landlock_get_fs_access_mask(domain, layer_level) |
> +			     ACCESS_INITIALLY_DENIED)) {

This is a future bug in the a next commit when 
landlock_get_fs_access_mask() is changed to get the network access mask. 
My patch will fix this part but you'll need to do a new copy of this 
function.



> +				(*layer_masks)[access_bit] |=
> +					BIT_ULL(layer_level);
> +				handled_accesses |= BIT_ULL(access_bit);
> +			}
> +		}
> +	}
> +	return handled_accesses;
> +}
> diff --git a/security/landlock/ruleset.h b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
> index 608ab356bc3e..50baff4fcbb4 100644
> --- a/security/landlock/ruleset.h
> +++ b/security/landlock/ruleset.h
> @@ -34,6 +34,16 @@ typedef u16 layer_mask_t;
>   /* Makes sure all layers can be checked. */
>   static_assert(BITS_PER_TYPE(layer_mask_t) >= LANDLOCK_MAX_NUM_LAYERS);
> 
> +/*
> + * All access rights that are denied by default whether they are handled or not
> + * by a ruleset/layer.  This must be ORed with all ruleset->fs_access_masks[]
> + * entries when we need to get the absolute handled access masks.
> + */
> +/* clang-format off */
> +#define ACCESS_INITIALLY_DENIED ( \
> +	LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_REFER)
> +/* clang-format on */

This ACCESS_INITIALLY_DENIED definition must be moved, not copied. You 
can rename ACCESS_INITIALLY_DENIED to ACCESS_FS_INITIALLY_DENIED and 
move this hunk before the access_mask_t definition.


> +
>   /**
>    * struct landlock_layer - Access rights for a given layer
>    */
> @@ -246,4 +256,14 @@ landlock_get_fs_access_mask(const struct landlock_ruleset *const ruleset,
>   		LANDLOCK_SHIFT_ACCESS_FS) &
>   	       LANDLOCK_MASK_ACCESS_FS;
>   }
> +
> +bool unmask_layers(const struct landlock_rule *const rule,

All public Landlock helpers must be prefixed with "landlock_"

> +		   const access_mask_t access_request,
> +		   layer_mask_t (*const layer_masks)[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS]);
> +
> +access_mask_t
> +init_layer_masks(const struct landlock_ruleset *const domain,
> +		 const access_mask_t access_request,
> +		 layer_mask_t (*const layer_masks)[LANDLOCK_NUM_ACCESS_FS]);

There is a warning generated by checkpatch.pl about this line:
   WARNING: function definition argument 'layer_mask_t' should also have 
an identifier name

I think this is a bug in checkpatch.pl

Any though Andy, Joe, Dwaipayan or Lukas?


> +
>   #endif /* _SECURITY_LANDLOCK_RULESET_H */
> --
> 2.25.1
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ