netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: sja1105: disallow C45 transactions on the BASE-TX MDIO bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 18 Nov 2022 14:31:44 +0100
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, olteanv@...il.com, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: sja1105: disallow C45 transactions on the
 BASE-TX MDIO bus

Am 2022-11-17 14:41, schrieb Andrew Lunn:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 09:11:05AM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
>> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
>> 
>> > I have a bit rotting patchset which completely separates C22 and C45,
>> > i just spend too much time reviewing other code to get my own merged.
>> 
>> I'm still rebasing your patchset to the latest next as I still
>> need it as a base for my patches regarding the maxlinear/microchip phy
>> issue :)
> 
> Feel free to post it. Just add your own Signed-off-by: after mine.
> 
> I can probably help with some of the review comments. I think the
> biggest problem i had was some reviews wanted more cleanup, when i was
> trying to keep it KISS to reduce the likelihood of breakage.

I wasn't aware that some of the patches were already sent to the
LKML. I guess you refer to this:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220508153049.427227-1-andrew@lunn.ch/

-michael