lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2022 12:10:11 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@...ine-koenig.org>
Cc: Angel Iglesias <ang.iglesiasg@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Purism Kernel Team <kernel@...i.sm>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 000/606] i2c: Complete conversion to i2c_probe_new
Hi Uwe,
> This series completes all drivers to this new callback (unless I missed
> something). It's based on current next/master.
Thanks for this work, really, but oh my poor inbox...
> I don't think it's feasable to apply this series in one go, so I ask the
> maintainers of the changed files to apply via their tree.
This seems reasonable. It would have made sense to send "patch series
per subsystem" then. So people only see the subset they are interested
in. I know filename-to-subsys mapping is hardly ever perfect. But in my
experience, even imperfect, it is more convenient than such a huge patch
series.
Happy hacking,
Wolfram
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists