netdev - [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: Add cross-compilation support for BPF programs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 19 Nov 2022 18:18:41 +0100
From:   Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>,
        Lina Wang <lina.wang@...iatek.com>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: Add cross-compilation support for BPF programs

From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>

The selftests/net does not have proper cross-compilation support, and
does not properly state libbpf as a dependency. Mimic/copy the BPF
build from selftests/bpf, which has the nice side-effect that libbpf
is built as well.

Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>
---
Now that BPF builds are starting to show up in more places
(selftests/net, and soon selftests/hid), maybe it would be cleaner to
move parts of the BPF builds to lib.mk?

Björn
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/bpf/Makefile | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/net/bpf/Makefile
index 8ccaf8732eb2..a26cb94354f6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/bpf/Makefile
@@ -1,14 +1,51 @@
 # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 
 CLANG ?= clang
+SCRATCH_DIR := $(OUTPUT)/tools
+BUILD_DIR := $(SCRATCH_DIR)/build
+BPFDIR := $(abspath ../../../lib/bpf)
+APIDIR := $(abspath ../../../include/uapi)
+
 CCINCLUDE += -I../../bpf
-CCINCLUDE += -I../../../../lib
 CCINCLUDE += -I../../../../../usr/include/
+CCINCLUDE += -I$(SCRATCH_DIR)/include
+
+BPFOBJ := $(BUILD_DIR)/libbpf/libbpf.a
+
+MAKE_DIRS := $(BUILD_DIR)/libbpf
+$(MAKE_DIRS):
+	mkdir -p $@
 
 TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS = $(OUTPUT)/bpf/nat6to4.o
 all: $(TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS)
 
-$(OUTPUT)/%.o: %.c
-	$(CLANG) -O2 -target bpf -c $< $(CCINCLUDE) -o $@
+# Get Clang's default includes on this system, as opposed to those seen by
+# '-target bpf'. This fixes "missing" files on some architectures/distros,
+# such as asm/byteorder.h, asm/socket.h, asm/sockios.h, sys/cdefs.h etc.
+#
+# Use '-idirafter': Don't interfere with include mechanics except where the
+# build would have failed anyways.
+define get_sys_includes
+$(shell $(1) $(2) -v -E - </dev/null 2>&1 \
+	| sed -n '/<...> search starts here:/,/End of search list./{ s| \(/.*\)|-idirafter \1|p }') \
+$(shell $(1) $(2) -dM -E - </dev/null | grep '__riscv_xlen ' | awk '{printf("-D__riscv_xlen=%d -D__BITS_PER_LONG=%d", $$3, $$3)}')
+endef
+
+ifneq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
+CLANG_TARGET_ARCH = --target=$(notdir $(CROSS_COMPILE:%-=%))
+endif
+
+CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES = $(call get_sys_includes,$(CLANG),$(CLANG_TARGET_ARCH))
+
+$(TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS): $(BPFOBJ)
+	$(CLANG) -O2 -target bpf -c $(@:.o=.c) $(CCINCLUDE) $(CLANG_SYS_INCLUDES) -o $@
+
+$(BPFOBJ): $(wildcard $(BPFDIR)/*.[ch] $(BPFDIR)/Makefile)		       \
+	   $(APIDIR)/linux/bpf.h					       \
+	   | $(BUILD_DIR)/libbpf
+	$(MAKE) $(submake_extras) -C $(BPFDIR) OUTPUT=$(BUILD_DIR)/libbpf/     \
+		    EXTRA_CFLAGS='-g -O0'				       \
+		    DESTDIR=$(SCRATCH_DIR) prefix= all install_headers
+
+EXTRA_CLEAN := $(TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS) $(SCRATCH_DIR)
 
-EXTRA_CLEAN := $(TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS)

base-commit: 8bd8dcc5e47f0f9dc40187c3b8b42d992181eee1
-- 
2.37.2