netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] net: tun: Fix use-after-free in tun

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 21 Nov 2022 08:47:17 -0800
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        syzbot+106f9b687cd64ee70cd1@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: tun: Fix use-after-free in tun_detach()

On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 1:02 AM Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> syzbot reported use-after-free in tun_detach() [1].  This causes call
> trace like below:
>
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in notifier_call_chain+0x1ee/0x200 kernel/notifier.c:75
> Read of size 8 at addr ffff88807324e2a8 by task syz-executor.0/3673
>
> CPU: 0 PID: 3673 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.1.0-rc5-syzkaller-00044-gcc675d22e422 #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
>  dump_stack_lvl+0xd1/0x138 lib/dump_stack.c:106
>  print_address_description mm/kasan/report.c:284 [inline]
>  print_report+0x15e/0x461 mm/kasan/report.c:395
>  kasan_report+0xbf/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:495
>  notifier_call_chain+0x1ee/0x200 kernel/notifier.c:75
>  call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0x86/0x130 net/core/dev.c:1942
>  call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:1983 [inline]
>  call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:1997 [inline]
>  netdev_wait_allrefs_any net/core/dev.c:10237 [inline]
>  netdev_run_todo+0xbc6/0x1100 net/core/dev.c:10351
>  tun_detach drivers/net/tun.c:704 [inline]
>  tun_chr_close+0xe4/0x190 drivers/net/tun.c:3467
>  __fput+0x27c/0xa90 fs/file_table.c:320
>  task_work_run+0x16f/0x270 kernel/task_work.c:179
>  exit_task_work include/linux/task_work.h:38 [inline]
>  do_exit+0xb3d/0x2a30 kernel/exit.c:820
>  do_group_exit+0xd4/0x2a0 kernel/exit.c:950
>  get_signal+0x21b1/0x2440 kernel/signal.c:2858
>  arch_do_signal_or_restart+0x86/0x2300 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:869
>  exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:168 [inline]
>  exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x15f/0x250 kernel/entry/common.c:203
>  __syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work kernel/entry/common.c:285 [inline]
>  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x50 kernel/entry/common.c:296
>  do_syscall_64+0x46/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:86
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
>
> The cause of the issue is that sock_put() from __tun_detach() drops
> last reference count for struct net, and then notifier_call_chain()
> from netdev_state_change() accesses that struct net.
>
> This patch fixes the issue by calling sock_put() from tun_detach()
> after all necessary accesses for the struct net has done.
>
> Fixes: 83c1f36f9880 ("tun: send netlink notification when the device is modified")
> Reported-by: syzbot+106f9b687cd64ee70cd1@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=96eb7f1ce75ef933697f24eeab928c4a716edefe [1]
> Signed-off-by: Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Include symbolic stack trace
> - Add Fixes and Reported-by tags
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221119075615.723290-1-syoshida@redhat.com/
> ---
>  drivers/net/tun.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 7a3ab3427369..ce9fcf4c8ef4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -686,7 +686,6 @@ static void __tun_detach(struct tun_file *tfile, bool clean)
>                 if (tun)
>                         xdp_rxq_info_unreg(&tfile->xdp_rxq);
>                 ptr_ring_cleanup(&tfile->tx_ring, tun_ptr_free);
> -               sock_put(&tfile->sk);
>         }
>  }
>
> @@ -702,6 +701,11 @@ static void tun_detach(struct tun_file *tfile, bool clean)
>         if (dev)
>                 netdev_state_change(dev);
>         rtnl_unlock();
> +
> +       if (clean) {

Would you mind explaining (a comment would be nice) why this barrier is needed ?

Thanks.

> +               synchronize_rcu();
> +               sock_put(&tfile->sk);
> +       }
>  }
>
>  static void tun_detach_all(struct net_device *dev)
> --
> 2.38.1
>