lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221121110602.6cc663f4@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Nov 2022 11:06:02 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Cc:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/8] devlink: use min_t to calculate data_size

On Mon, 21 Nov 2022 10:35:34 -0800 Jacob Keller wrote:
> > Sure, that makes sense.
> 
> This becomes the only variable in patch 5 of 8. It ends up making the 
> diff look more complicated if I change it back to a combined 
> declare+assign in that patch.

Don't change it back to declare+assign, then? :)
In general declare+assign should be used sparingly IMO.
My eyes are trained to skip right past the variable declarations,
the goal is to make the code clear, not short :S

BTW you can probably make DEVLINK_REGION_READ_CHUNK_SIZE a ULL to switch
from min_t() to min() ?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ